Jump to content
Male HQ

Current Superman Is Bi


begleitung

Recommended Posts

On 10/12/2021 at 1:34 PM, Guest lOve said:

He’s the original Superman Clark Kent’s son - Jon Kent. Boyfriend is Jay

spacer.png

 

His sharp chin can be used as a weapon.

鍾意就好,理佢男定女

 

never argue with the guests. let them bark all they want.

 

结缘不结

不解缘

 

After I have said what I wanna say, I don't care what you say.

 

看穿不说穿

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Yumiko Kotatsu
On 10/12/2021 at 6:52 PM, Guest Fatty said:

This is so wrong 

 

Yep, the slippery slope of justifying everything from a gay point of view.

 

With no regard to young people 's development.

 

So wrong , so corrupted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/12/2021 at 8:47 PM, Guest Yumiko Kotatsu said:

 

Yep, the slippery slope of justifying everything from a gay point of view.

 

With no regard to young people 's development.

 

So wrong , so corrupted.

Its similar to the the real world . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Yumiko Kotatsu
On 10/12/2021 at 8:59 PM, Kimochi said:

Its similar to the the real world . 

 

The real world places certain restrictions on children and young adults gaining access to free for all images and adult contents. 

 

Gay Pov is no restrictions . Free for all . 

 

With no regard for consequences. 

 

Eg . 

 

NAMBLA.

 

Simply corrupting. 

 

Slippery slope.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/12/2021 at 6:52 AM, Guest Fatty said:

This is so wrong 

 

I don't think there is anything wrong. It is just showing that there is sexuality is a spectrum. 

 

On 10/12/2021 at 5:54 AM, Guest yumiko kotatsu said:

Absolutely corrupting infuence of young minds, dangerous

 

No. It is not corrupting or influencing young minds. It is to teach them that there are people who are different from them and that is it ok.

 

BTW, I would like to understand how is this corrupting or wrong?

Love. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So dissapointing that superman is gay. Superman is the ultimate symbol of manhood and ultra macho. Who wants a loud bitchy gay superman as most gays are loud, loves gossip and buy only branded goods.  I call for a boycott of a gay superman!

 

Share these hashtags I created as its trending Worldwide.

 

#MakeSupermanStraightAgain

#NoToGaySuperman

#StraightSupermanIsSexy

#SupermanIsIntoPussy

#MakeSupermanMachoAgain

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/12/2021 at 11:37 PM, Guest Guest said:

So dissapointing that superman is gay. Superman is the ultimate symbol of manhood and ultra macho. Who wants a loud bitchy gay superman as most gays are loud, loves gossip and buy only branded goods.  I call for a boycott of a gay superman!

 

Share these hashtags I created as its trending Worldwide.

 

#MakeSupermanStraightAgain

#NoToGaySuperman

#StraightSupermanIsSexy

#SupermanIsIntoPussy

#MakeSupermanMachoAgain

 

 

U haven't met manly gays b4?

 

Poor u.

鍾意就好,理佢男定女

 

never argue with the guests. let them bark all they want.

 

结缘不结

不解缘

 

After I have said what I wanna say, I don't care what you say.

 

看穿不说穿

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/12/2021 at 11:37 AM, Guest Guest said:

So dissapointing that superman is gay. Superman is the ultimate symbol of manhood and ultra macho. Who wants a loud bitchy gay superman as most gays are loud, loves gossip and buy only branded goods.  I call for a boycott of a gay superman!

 

Share these hashtags I created as its trending Worldwide.

 

#MakeSupermanStraightAgain

#NoToGaySuperman

#StraightSupermanIsSexy

#SupermanIsIntoPussy

#MakeSupermanMachoAgain

 

 

 

The new Superman is not gay. He is bi. Get your facts right. So based on your extreme views and stereotypes, straight men are the complete opposite of gay men? 

 

So a straight hetero superman will be soft-spoken, stoic, and silent? Loves to be serious, and buy only non-branded goods? Really, there is no such thing as non-branded goods nowadays. Even the cheapest thing you buy comes with a brand name on it. 

 

So what are your opinions of a Superman who is bi? 

 

#SupermanIsIntoPussyAndCocksAndAss

 

P.s. Superman is a fictional character ICYMI.

Edited by doncoin

Love. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/13/2021 at 10:24 AM, Guest Mickey mouze said:

 

Manly gays , is an oxymoron.

 

It doesnt exist.

 

Orientation vs behaviour. 

 

Now I understand your frustration. 

鍾意就好,理佢男定女

 

never argue with the guests. let them bark all they want.

 

结缘不结

不解缘

 

After I have said what I wanna say, I don't care what you say.

 

看穿不说穿

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Suddenly turning Superman into a bisexual is ridiculous because the character has been completely straight for 83 years. I don't think making sudden changes in sexual orientation that clearly go against character, even fictional character, should be done so lightly. This is Iceman all over again and all this will do is unnecessarily turn off some fans.

 

Superman has a clearly established straight history with Lana Lang as a teenager, Lori Lemaris as a university student, and Lois Lane as an adult. There is no history of him indulging in curiosity with Pete Ross, Lex Luthor, Jimmy Olsen, or any other males. DC could have invented a new character who is bi or revealed a lesser-known character as bi.

 

I could actually understand revealing Wonder Woman as bi since she's a princess from an island that only has females. But to do so with well-established versions of time-honored characters like Superman, Batman, Robin, Aquaman, Flash, Green Lantern, Green Arrow, Hawkman, or the Atom is terrible, like what Marvel did to Iceman, in my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/13/2021 at 4:55 PM, Guest 2003 said:

Suddenly turning Superman into a bisexual is ridiculous because the character has been completely straight for 83 years. I don't think making sudden changes in sexual orientation that clearly go against character, even fictional character, should be done so lightly. This is Iceman all over again and all this will do is unnecessarily turn off some fans.

 

Superman has a clearly established straight history with Lana Lang as a teenager, Lori Lemaris as a university student, and Lois Lane as an adult. There is no history of him indulging in curiosity with Pete Ross, Lex Luthor, Jimmy Olsen, or any other males. DC could have invented a new character who is bi or revealed a lesser-known character as bi.

 

 

I grew up watching the superman movies, smallville and all the other superman shows. The Superman you talking about is Clark Kent. He has been portrayed as straight. However, I feel that his son, Jon Kent, being Bi does not make it ridiculous at all. Especially since its modern times. His son is just carrying the mantle of superman forward. That does not make all superman Bi. 

Edited by SAKnight93
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/13/2021 at 4:55 PM, Guest 2003 said:

Suddenly turning Superman into a bisexual is ridiculous because the character has been completely straight for 83 years. I don't think making sudden changes in sexual orientation that clearly go against character, even fictional character, should be done so lightly. This is Iceman all over again and all this will do is unnecessarily turn off some fans.

 

Superman has a clearly established straight history with Lana Lang as a teenager, Lori Lemaris as a university student, and Lois Lane as an adult. There is no history of him indulging in curiosity with Pete Ross, Lex Luthor, Jimmy Olsen, or any other males. DC could have invented a new character who is bi or revealed a lesser-known character as bi.

 

I could actually understand revealing Wonder Woman as bi since she's a princess from an island that only has females. But to do so with well-established versions of time-honored characters like Superman, Batman, Robin, Aquaman, Flash, Green Lantern, Green Arrow, Hawkman, or the Atom is terrible, like what Marvel did to Iceman, in my opinion.

Are you the author? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There seem to be a lack of facts, and Guests are twisting their granny panties into slingshots.

 

The new Superman is bi. Not gay, but bi, meaning he is an equal opportunist when it comes to having and forming relationships with both genders. 

This new Superman is not the original Clark Kent. It is his son. So the original Clark Kent is still a straight hetero male alien.

 

So for those who are upset that Superman is suddenly into dicks, you got your facts wrong. DC Comics is talking about a different guy. 

 

Long-enduring fictional characters do get updated with the times to stay relevant. 

Love. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just sharing this from our print version of Straits Times today, Life Section (13 October 2021).

 

spacer.png

 

 

Happy - is what we should be, always.

 

Notice: I DO NOT use the Chat Function in this Forum - this has always been written in my profile (and I don't read it too).

{it is unfortunate that this new Chat Function does not allow users to turn/switch off in mobile phone}

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Meanly Preacher
On 10/13/2021 at 10:52 AM, doncoin said:

There seem to be a lack of facts, and Guests are twisting their granny panties into slingshots. The new Superman is bi. Not gay, but bi, meaning he is an equal opportunist when it comes to having and forming relationships with both genders. This new Superman is not the original Clark Kent. It is his son. So the original Clark Kent is still a straight hetero male alien. So for those who are upset that Superman is suddenly into dicks, you got your facts wrong. DC Comics is talking about a different guy. Long-enduring fictional characters do get updated with the times to stay relevant. 

 

To be honest, in my opinion anyway, the original poster is even more at fault than the guests. When 99% of the general public sees the name Superman, they think of Clark Kent, and very few people outside of avid DC Comics readers have any idea that Clark Kent and Lois Lane have had a son named Jon who is now a young adult. Blowing Wind is a general forum, not a comic book forum, and the original poster should have been clear in the title that it is referring to Superman's Son.

 

A much better title would be Superman's Son Comes Out As Bi, and it would be nice if the original poster or a moderator would change the title, to avoid further confusion in the future. To 99% of the general public, Jon Kent will always be thought of as Superman's Son (if they think of him at all), not as Superman. Jon might "technically" be the new Superman but that is not how the general public thinks after more than 80 years of Clark Kent being widely known as Superman's alter ego.

 

The original title is lazy, misleading, poorly written, sloppy clickbait, and perfectly exemplifies many of the problems that plague the internet today. I bet the original poster is not even a "real" Superman fan, but a vapid horny airhead who saw a link about a "bi Superman" on social media, and immediately ran here to Blowing Wind to "share" it without any additional consideration of background or context. That is the exact same way coronavirus misinformation has spread all around the world.

 

My point is simply that people should be more considerate of the community at large when they post new threads. They should give concise and correct information while avoiding the use of too many words that might overwhelm readers and cause them to tune out. A misleading (or at least incomplete) two-word title, a link with no context, and a short comment about a hot photo is not a profound way to spark a robust intellectual discussion. We should all make efforts to be better posters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If a person thinks that by exposing a child to the knowledge that gay orientation exists & that will corrupt or even influence them to be gays, why all of us, who are exposed to a straight Superman for the longest time, not grow up as straight? 
 

Letting kids know that sexual orientation or even true love is not restricted to just between a man & women is nothing dirty, shameful or corrupting. And it definitely will not turn anyone gay or straight 

Edited by robin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/14/2021 at 7:06 AM, robin said:

If a person thinks that by exposing a child to the knowledge that gay orientation exists & that will corrupt or even influence them to be gays, why all of us, who are exposed to a straight Superman for the longest time, not grow up as straight? 
 

Letting kids know that sexual orientation or even true love is not restricted to just between a man & women is nothing dirty, shameful or corrupting. And it definitely will not turn anyone gay or straight 

 

practice what you preach , please expose your nieces and nephews, offsprings, and children of friends to these kind explicit material and then do a study and publish your results.

 

 

see who , adults in their right mind will allow you to expose these kinds of corrupting influence on their chidren's young minds

 

 

pooooi

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Common sense
On 10/14/2021 at 1:03 PM, Guest create said:

 

practice what you preach , please expose your nieces and nephews, offsprings, and children of friends to these kind explicit material and then do a study and publish your results.

 

 

see who , adults in their right mind will allow you to expose these kinds of corrupting influence on their chidren's young minds

 

 

pooooi

 

 

 

 

Perhaps you may want to clarify, do you mean we should shield young minds from knowing there are gays in this world?

 

I have been openly gay since my 20s . All my straight friends and relatives have accepted me and my partner. Their children including all my nieces and nephews also know about my partner and I. None of my nieces or nephews is gay , but they are very tolerant and accepting of LGBTQ. One of my nieces who is married, she also does not shield her children, rather my grand nieces and grand nephew from knowing about us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/13/2021 at 2:55 PM, Guest Meanly Preacher said:

A much better title would be Superman's Son Comes Out As Bi, and it would be nice if the original poster or a moderator would change the title, to avoid further confusion in the future. To 99% of the general public, Jon Kent will always be thought of as Superman's Son (if they think of him at all), not as Superman. Jon might "technically" be the new Superman but that is not how the general public thinks after more than 80 years of Clark Kent being widely known as Superman's alter ego.

 

The original title is lazy, misleading, poorly written, sloppy clickbait, and perfectly exemplifies many of the problems that plague the internet today. I bet the original poster is not even a "real" Superman fan, but a vapid horny airhead who saw a link about a "bi Superman" on social media, and immediately ran here to Blowing Wind to "share" it without any additional consideration of background or context. That is the exact same way coronavirus misinformation has spread all around the world.

 

Completely agree. If the malicious original poster had used a proper title, instead of typing his uninformative two-word clickbait, there would be no confusion. He also didn't put any helpful information inside his post, just a link, and most internet readers do not click on unknown links unless they want their computers or phones infected with viruses. Another alternative title could be New Version of Superman is Bi. The original poster needs to be more considerate towards the mindset of Blowing Wind's readership in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/14/2021 at 1:03 AM, Guest create said:

 

practice what you preach , please expose your nieces and nephews, offsprings, and children of friends to these kind explicit material and then do a study and publish your results.

see who , adults in their right mind will allow you to expose these kinds of corrupting influence on their chidren's young minds

pooooi

 

 

My nephews know me as the "guncle" the gay uncle, and have in the past met with my ex. My ex babysits his neighbour's kids and even helped picked them up from school when the parents had work emergencies. To many kids who grew up with gay parents, or been surrounded by gay adults, it is their normal. They grew up feeling loved and protected, and their parents are just parents, even if it is 2 mums or 2 dads. 

 

What is corrupting about knowing that LGBTQ+ people exists? In the context of the new Superman, it is DC Comics. There is nothing explicit in it beyond a passionate kiss between two men. 

 

Keeping a child's mind "sheltered" will not protect the child. They will grow up and find out anyway. It is better, in my opinion, to expose them to the different people, cultures, societies, the way the live, think, etc. and explain it to them on your terms, versus letting them find out from others. Knowledge is neutral, it is how you apply the knowledge that makes it corruption or not. 

 

For a person who writes such an asinine post, in a gay forum, if you are a gay man, you need to let go of the hate you have for yourself, and embrace that you are a light that can shine positively for the people around you. If you are a homophobic troll, go read up on the years of research studies of children who grew up in gay households, who turned out just as healthy, and well-adjusted adults. 

Love. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Same-sex attraction is not a perversion and it does not corrupt. It's part of creation and nature. Homosexuality is practiced in the animal kingdom. 

 

Homosexuality is recorded in the Bible and in many cultural texts and they do not hold it in a negative light.

 

Gay men have suffered marginalization and persecution because we do not conform with the norm.

 

DC, Walt Disney and some media have responsibly introduced same-sex attraction to people and young minds. This does not turn them gay but to educate them so they could understand and harness goodwill among people of different orientations.

 

Homophobes and haters will continue with their prejudice and bigotry which are deeply rooted in insecurity or evil indoctrination.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/14/2021 at 1:03 PM, Guest create said:

 

practice what you preach , please expose your nieces and nephews, offsprings, and children of friends to these kind explicit material and then do a study and publish your results.

 

 

see who , adults in their right mind will allow you to expose these kinds of corrupting influence on their chidren's young minds

 

 

pooooi

 

 

 

 

 

Explicit materials? My nieces and nephews have known about me and my partner since they were as young as 4 years old.  As kids, they have enjoyed staying over at my place.  One of them has even asked how come his dad could not lead the lifestyle similar to mine, one that is not heavy burdened?  This year, two of my nephews became attached and during CNY, they were so excited to bring their girlfriends to my place so they could meet the 'cool gay uncle'.  We had a good time catching up over tea.   So what's wrong with kids growing up knowing gays exist?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Meanly Preacher
On 10/14/2021 at 5:55 AM, Guest 2003 said:

Another alternative title could be New Version of Superman is Bi.

 

That would also be a whole lot more informative than the pathetic clickbait currently masquerading as a title.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/13/2021 at 4:17 AM, doncoin said:

 

 

The new Superman is not gay. He is bi. Get your facts right. So based on your extreme views and stereotypes, straight men are the complete opposite of gay men? 

 

So a straight hetero superman will be soft-spoken, stoic, and silent? Loves to be serious, and buy only non-branded goods? Really, there is no such thing as non-branded goods nowadays. Even the cheapest thing you buy comes with a brand name on it. 

 

So what are your opinions of a Superman who is bi? 

 

#SupermanIsIntoPussyAndCocksAndAss

 

P.s. Superman is a fictional character ICYMI.

Lol, very true.  
 

all the cliches. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/14/2021 at 5:17 PM, Guest Fatty said:

Show them a big cock and all will become ah gua 

 

Per this train of thought: 

The size of your penis defines the percentage of manliness.  I wonder how would guys with small cocks feel or even guys with average size penis? 

 

Ever hear of behaving like your age instead of your penis size? 

 

Love. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/14/2021 at 5:35 PM, begleitung said:

i bet he was a troll. 

 

I bet he wasn't a "troll" in the normal use of that word on this website. You need to understand that the world is a whole lot bigger than your personal bubble and Blowing Wind is a publicly searchable website available to every major internet search engine. Now you need to think about the fact that Fox News, Breitbart, and the rest of the Crazy Right Wing Media in America have declared war on DC Comics over this new version of Superman. They are repeatedly showing reports and publishing articles on how this new version of Superman is corrupting children (regardless of the truth because they don't care about the truth).

 

How do Fox News viewers, and Breitbart readers, and other consumers of Crazy Right Wing Media in America react when they see that propaganda? Their fear levels rise and they go into attack mode. They go online and search for a term like "bi Superman" (which is exactly what your original title is for this post). Then they start looking for articles or discussions they can comment on with their incorrect opinions that a "bi Superman" is corrupting children. That is how they act and they have been doing it for many years on countless topics. What this means is that your two-world no-context title is probably what attracted that "troll" to BW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/16/2021 at 2:40 AM, begleitung said:

Woohoo, i am or rather my thread is famous. 🙄

 

Crazy American Right Wing Media fans flocking to Blowing Wind because this terribly-titled thread shows up in their Google search results while they are looking for articles to perpetuate their homophobic attacks on DC Comics is not a laughing matter! Grow up!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Salmon Swirl Quit His Girl
On 10/16/2021 at 12:35 AM, Guest 2003 said:

I bet he wasn't a "troll" in the normal use of that word on this website. You need to understand that the world is a whole lot bigger than your personal bubble and Blowing Wind is a publicly searchable website available to every major internet search engine. Now you need to think about the fact that Fox News, Breitbart, and the rest of the Crazy Right Wing Media in America have declared war on DC Comics over this new version of Superman. They are repeatedly showing reports and publishing articles on how this new version of Superman is corrupting children (regardless of the truth because they don't care about the truth).

 

How do Fox News viewers, and Breitbart readers, and other consumers of Crazy Right Wing Media in America react when they see that propaganda? Their fear levels rise and they go into attack mode. They go online and search for a term like "bi Superman" (which is exactly what your original title is for this post). Then they start looking for articles or discussions they can comment on with their incorrect opinions that a "bi Superman" is corrupting children. That is how they act and they have been doing it for many years on countless topics. What this means is that your two-world no-context title is probably what attracted that "troll" to BW.

 

They are not trolls and they are not crazy. People like that are simply standing up for their personal family values. What happens in the bedroom shoud only remain in the bedroom and not be smeared across the pages of children's media to flood their minds with sexual topics before they are old enough to maturely deal with such materials. Biden lovers like you thinlk "anything goes" but you are completely wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • G_M changed the title to Superman's Son Comes Out As Bi
Guest Wonder Man

If Superman shoot inside the other guy, will the other guy explode from inside out from the force of the ejaculation? If the other guy insert into Superman and he clench his butt muscle, will the other guy’s kkj be squashed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • begleitung changed the title to Current Superman Is Bi
Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...