Man Appears Free Of Hiv After Stem Cell Transplant

[HendryTan]

Received the following in my mailbox, from CNN so I believe it isn't a hoax.

Man appears free of HIV after stem cell transplant

By Jacquelyne Froeber

http://www.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/02/11/health.hiv.stemcell/

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A 42-year-old HIV patient with leukemia appears to have no detectable HIV in his blood and no symptoms after a stem cell transplant from a donor carrying a gene mutation that confers natural resistance to the virus that causes AIDS, according to a report published Wednesday in the New England Journal of Medicine.

The patient underwent a stem cell transplant and since, has not tested positive for HIV in his blood.

"The patient is fine," said Dr. Gero Hutter of Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin in Germany. "Today, two years after his transplantation, he is still without any signs of HIV disease and without antiretroviral medication."

The case was first reported in November, and the new report is the first official publication of the case in a medical journal. Hutter and a team of medical professionals performed the stem cell transplant on the patient, an American living in Germany, to treat the man's leukemia, not the HIV itself.

However, the team deliberately chose a compatible donor who has a naturally occurring gene mutation that confers resistance to HIV. The mutation cripples a receptor known as CCR5, which is normally found on the surface of T cells, the type of immune system cells attacked by HIV.

The mutation is known as CCR5 delta32 and is found in 1 percent to 3 percent of white populations of European descent.

HIV uses the CCR5 as a co-receptor (in addition to CD4 receptors) to latch on to and ultimately destroy immune system cells. Since the virus can't gain a foothold on cells that lack CCR5, people who have the mutation have natural protection. (There are other, less common HIV strains that use different co-receptors.)

People who inherit one copy of CCR5 delta32 take longer to get sick or develop AIDS if infected with HIV. People with two copies (one from each parent) may not become infected at all. The stem cell donor had two copies.

While promising, the treatment is unlikely to help the vast majority of people infected with HIV, said Dr. Jay Levy, a professor at the University of California San Francisco, who wrote an editorial accompanying the study. A stem cell transplant is too extreme and too dangerous to be used as a routine treatment, he said.

"About a third of the people die [during such transplants], so it's just too much of a risk," Levy said. To perform a stem cell transplant, doctors intentionally destroy a patient's immune system, leaving the patient vulnerable to infection, and then reintroduce a donor's stem cells (which are from either bone marrow or blood) in an effort to establish a new, healthy immune system.

Levy also said it's unlikely that the transplant truly cured the patient in this study. HIV can infect many other types of cells and may be hiding out in the patient's body to resurface at a later time, he said.

"This type of virus can infect macrophages (another type of white blood cell that expresses CCR5) and other cells, like the brain cells, and it could live a lifetime. But if it can't spread, you never see it-- but it's there and it could do some damage," he said. "It's not the kind of approach that you could say, 'I've cured you.' I've eliminated the virus from your body."

Before undergoing the transplant, the patient was also found to be infected with low levels of a type of HIV known as X4, which does not use the CCR5 receptor to infect cells. So it would seem that this virus would still be able to grow and damage immune cells in his body. However, following the transplant, signs of leukemia and HIV were absent.

"There is no really conclusive explanation why we didn't observe any rebound of HIV," Hutter said. "This finding is very surprising."

Hutter noted that one year ago, the patient had a relapse of leukemia and a second transplant from the same donor. The patient experienced complications from the procedure, including temporary liver problems and kidney failure, but they were not unusual and may occur in HIV-negative patients, he said.

Researchers including Hutter agree that the technique should not be used to treat HIV alone. "Some people may say, 'I want to do it,'" said Levy. A more logical -- and potentially safer -- approach would be to develop some type of CCR5-disabling gene therapy or treatment that could be directly injected into the body, said Levy.

Less invasive options to alter CCR5 could be on the horizon within the next five years, said Levy. "It's definitely the wave of the future," he said. "As we continue to follow this one patient, we will learn a lot."

One drug that's currently on the market that blocks CCR5 is called maraviroc (Selzentry). It was first approved in 2007 and is used in combination with other antiretroviral drugs. Health.com: Who's most at risk for STDs?

In 2007, an estimated 2 million people died from AIDS, and 2.7 million people contracted HIV. More than 15 million women are infected worldwide. HIV/AIDS can be transmitted through sexual intercourse, sharing needles, pregnancy, breast-feeding, and/or blood transfusions with an infected person. Health.com:What should I do if the condom breaks?

"For HIV patients, this report is an important flicker of hope that antiretroviral therapy like HAART [highly active antiretroviral therapy] is not the endpoint of medical research," Hutter said.

[reflection]

Henry,

It isnt a hoax.... New England Journal of Medicine

I have read about this CCR5 receptor thing years ago......It means that some people somehow lack this CCR5 as an abnormality but they are immuned to

HIV-I because virus cannot find CCR5 in the CD4 in order to enter and infect the white blood cell.

Edited February 15, 2009 by reflection

[Guest HIV Positive]

Fellows,

I know it is great concern for PLUs about getting infected with HIV but presently, the antiviral treatment program carried by CDC is amongst the vey best in the world. The crux of it all is to know you are free from the virus.

My advise to you all out there is: if you have been freely having sex, even fully protected, you should get tested to see your health standing position.

I was tested positive three years ago and after much alarm, I am living a normal life with the antiviral treatment that I am receiving from CDC. It is on the high side but not that very costly. My last Viral Load test showed that the virus was UNDETECTED inmy system.

It is now a know fact that HIV infected persons are treated by doctors as people with high blood or diabete: a cronic illness.

My advice: while there is still no cure to HIV, medication really helps you lead a normal life away from being weaken to other illness. Seek medication when tested positive.

[Guest Workaholic]

Fellows,

I was tested positive three years ago and after much alarm, I am living a normal life with the antiviral treatment that I am receiving from CDC. It is on the high side but not that very costly. My last Viral Load test showed that the virus was UNDETECTED inmy system.

Tell us more, how much is your monthly medical expenses, is your work affected for regular check up during weekdays. Did you keep it from your employer, how did you survive on daily life like the type of food you eat, drinks. Did you lao sai frequently from what I heard or suffer any rashes?