groyn88 Posted March 6 Report Share Posted March 6 (edited) On Monday, 3 March 2025, Goh Meng Seng, leader and Secretary-General of the People's Power Party (PPP), announced on his Facebook that his party would be contesting in Nee Soon GRC, for the upcoming General Elections. He also declared his intention to run on a pro-family platform, adding that he would not allow the "LGBTQ agenda" to distract from the importance of growing Singapore's "core population". He wrote: "PPP vs PAP Nee Soon Team There is speculation that PAP might be fielding a well known LGBTQ activist in Nee Soon. PPP is set to contest in Nee Soon GRC and is definitely mindful of such potential move by PAP. First of all, I have put it clearly, we have absolutely nothing against LGBTQ as individuals. We respect everyone as a human being and empathize greatly on the challenges which the LGBTQ community face in life. However, as a politician who will deal with public policy for the greater good of the Nation, I will have to take a firm stance to maintain the sustainability and long term survival of this Nation which has a small population. The family unit is the most fundamental pillar of a country, without it, the Nation may just go into extinction. Thus the importance of the basic family unit must be enshrined in our Constitution, thus we would want the Constitution to state unequivocally clear that the legal definition of a family unit could only be a union of a biological Male and Female, nothing else. As we are already facing an existential crisis of an extremely low Total Fertility Rate (of 0.97), we should strengthen our Pro Family policies and we should not allow LGBTQ Agenda to distract or divert our attention from the importance of growing our Core Population. The impressionable minds of our young should not be subjected to the undue influence of LGBTQ Agenda. LGBTQ should not be, cannot be, must not be a "Lifestyle Choice". While we do not discriminate any individual LGBTQ in jobs and such, but we should not promote LGBTQ as a form of lifestyle because it will be detrimental to the fundamental sustainability of our country. This is the fundamental reason why I have resisted from attending Pink Dot all these years, not that I am "anti-LGBTQ" but in full consideration on the sustainability and survival of our country, we should refrain from promoting LGBTQ Agenda. There are claims made that Singaporeans are becoming more "liberal" and may be ready for more changes under the context of "inclusivity" for LGBTQ Agenda, including but not limited to same sex marriage. I will resist such narrative and will reason that such changes will be detrimental to our country. As far as I know, no other political parties have made a clear stance on this important issue because everyone is chasing after the "Pink Votes". PPP is the only political party that is making a principled stance in full clarity. If PAP's Nee Soon Team is pitching as the Pink Political Avant-garde team, PPP would be ready to contest them based on our Core Values of Nationhood. For a nation to survive, the family unit must be a union between male and female. I don't see how any rational voter could disagree with that."" Links: https://the-singapore-lgbt-encyclopaedia.fandom.com/wiki/Goh_Meng_Seng's_views_on_LGBT_rights Edited March 6 by groyn88 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
singalion Posted March 6 Report Share Posted March 6 I always have to laugh when I read this word LGBT Agenda... What organisations in Singapore are seriously pushing any LGBT Agenda? Pink dot? Let's get down on the floor and don't exaggerate. By the way - only because another party might field a homosexual candidate - then speaking out on this, seems a bit awkward. Attack political candidates by their policy proposals but please not on their sexual orientation. I have no objections by the Singapore government pushing for more kids to be born and promoting family values, but honestly, in my personal view, homosexuals will be homosexuals, and they won't get fewer by such family or procreation increasing programs... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Why? Posted March 7 Report Share Posted March 7 18 hours ago, groyn88 said: On Monday, 3 March 2025, Goh Meng Seng,declared his intention to run on a pro-family platform, adding that he would not allow the "LGBTQ agenda" to distract from the importance of growing Singapore's "core population". This man seems to be on a suicide mission. He has a clear agenda (clearer than the subtle LGBT one): to win over fundamentalists. However, he has no track record of leadership, which is equally crucial to his "holier than thou" supporters. Simultaneously, he eliminates every LGBT vote. I hope it will be his final election, as he stated. Veloster 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thatguy642 Posted March 7 Report Share Posted March 7 Man what a loser, he probably needs some dick. Truly, though, it’s sad that I can think of quite many Singaporeans who agree with him. We’re so far behind. Veloster 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Veloster Posted March 7 Report Share Posted March 7 If it's not this ding dong of this party ote the religious leaders who are the greatest idiots ..even the pope says god loves us all bi guys gay guys str guys... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jockstrapbtm Posted March 7 Report Share Posted March 7 Goh Meng Seng last round shrink to him one person attack MacPherson. If people don't contest Nee Soon, is they don't want waste time on a seat they cannot get more than 43% of the vote. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Naveyafluz Posted March 8 Report Share Posted March 8 I wondered why LGBT is linked to politics? He should just focus on Singaporeans than trying to gain such attention. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FattChoy Posted March 8 Report Share Posted March 8 (edited) 1) What exactly is the LGBTQ agenda? 2) I don't think G has the same agenda as L or T. 3) How would you define Q anyway, without referring to AI or the internet? 4) I don't even think 2Gs have the same agenda. 5) Pink is such a sucky loud colour. Yucks. How about Black for G? Edited March 8 by FattChoy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Why? Posted March 8 Report Share Posted March 8 6 hours ago, Naveyafluz said: I wondered why LGBT is linked to politics? He should just focus on Singaporeans than trying to gain such attention. He has already ran out of steam, thus attacking LGBT needs very little effort and is his most convenient option. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doncoin Posted March 8 Report Share Posted March 8 When ignorant people like Goh Meng Seng uses terms like gay agenda as a negative, he is basically saying that he opposes equality. He don't want gay people to be treated equally and supports the right to discriminate to protect whatever values or ideals he is protecting. Veloster 1 Quote Love. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youdoyou Posted March 8 Report Share Posted March 8 It’s giving “I’m not racist but…” also, lgbt wasn’t and isn’t a “lifestyle choice”. It’s a lived reality. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Why? Posted March 9 Report Share Posted March 9 When someone who fervently supported democracy stated that it should exclude the LGBT, I lost faith in him. This guy is a typical example. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts