Singapore Local Gay News [LGBT Related News] (Compiled)

[Guest xdude]

In his line of work, he can be on all the gay sites, even Grindr, during working hours, and pass it off as "market research".

What's your excuse?

Wanting to meet me for sex is part of work? Sending me his nude photo is part of work?

Are you another blind SK supporter?

I was merely curious if he was trying to get as much sex as he can before he goes to trial and possibly jail.

[Guest xdude]

Let's wish him well please ...

I hope jail is the most they are going after. Heard that the police is gathering more evidence to prove more than just possession. Personally, I wish him well too.

[Guest Neutral]

I hope jail is the most they are going after. Heard that the police is gathering more evidence to prove more than just possession. Personally, I wish him well too.

Oh really?

If you wish someone well, you would leave someone alone, instead of adopting the behaviour of some tongue wanging gossipy NTUC aunty, or some itchy backside busybody. More like some shit stirrer

Frankly, I am close personal friend of SK who communicates with him almost everyday. If you do not know the whole entire story/what really happened or what is he doing currently, I sugguest you go bury your nose in between the hairy ass of a very fat Arab, taste his twinkle berries, smell his fart, which that will awaken some life to your 0.01 gm smaller-than-a pean size brain.

Or join the circus. You dont require a brain for that kind of job.

[Guest xdude]

Oh really?

If you wish someone well, you would leave someone alone, instead of adopting the behaviour of some tongue wanging gossipy NTUC aunty, or some itchy backside busybody. More like some shit stirrer

Frankly, I am close personal friend of SK who communicates with him almost everyday. If you do not know the whole entire story/what really happened or what is he doing currently, I sugguest you go bury your nose in between the hairy ass of a very fat Arab, taste his twinkle berries, smell his fart, which that will awaken some life to your 0.01 gm smaller-than-a pean size brain.

Or join the circus. You dont require a brain for that kind of job.

What an oxymoron in the use of "Neutral" when you say you are a close friend of Stuart. Does it mean you are the only friend of his? OR only person who knows him here. I know for a fact that the police have been contacting some of his friends/employees/acquaintances to see if they can prove SK is more involved than just possession.

You just sound like one of his bitchy fag croonies. If he is indeed clean, he will be proven innocent in court, but from what I know and hear, SK isn't as innocent as some of you deluded "friends" think he is. In fact, many people in his close circle are KNOWN to play with stuff.

That being said, it is his business what he wants to do with his life. The police must have already had enough evidence to even dare search his place. That is why I wish him well and that they can't go for more than just possession. I wouldn't like to see him hang.

[Guest xdude]

It is likely that many friends who are defending Stuart are afraid of the repercussions of this case. No wonder they seem to come in here to bitch others who bring this topic up. Sorry, but this isn't going to help Stuart. You just can't make things go away that simply. Instead of using such bitchy/condescending language against those you accuse of gossip mongering, why not instead present facts that put Stuart in a more positive light? With friends like these, who needs enemies?

Anyway I really wonder what made the police make its move. Was it internal sabotage? Loss of favour of the real ring leader? Or was this a case of the homophobic church groups trying to make the gay community look as bad as possible.

[Guest Neutral]

What an oxymoron in the use of "Neutral" when you say you are a close friend of Stuart. Does it mean you are the only friend of his? OR only person who knows him here. I know for a fact that the police have been contacting some of his friends/employees/acquaintances to see if they can prove SK is more involved than just possession.

You just sound like one of his bitchy fag croonies. If he is indeed clean, he will be proven innocent in court, but from what I know and hear, SK isn't as innocent as some of you deluded "friends" think he is. In fact, many people in his close circle are KNOWN to play with stuff.

That being said, it is his business what he wants to do with his life. The police must have already had enough evidence to even dare search his place. That is why I wish him well and that they can't go for more than just possession. I wouldn't like to see him hang.

I am one of his close friend but not the only close friend he has. With his wider range of contacts, he has many friends, but due to what had happened to him, and him being a private person, he had already filtered the people he can now trust.

Not all his friends does such stuff so, little girl, go straighten up your skirt and all your facts before posting anything here.

By accusing or generalizing all friends as such, you are indeed a slanderer.

Among his friends, some of us already know each other.

Because he is aware he is being watched and tapped by the authories very closely, he doesn't want to meet me and some of his friends for the time being, or talk over the phone for too long, fearing we the innocent parties will or maybe implicated. This is at least a thoughtful act for his friends coming from his part.

Thus, it doesnt do him or implicates anyone he knows, any harm, should he chooses to indulge in any form of activities, within his time space and limits. Now since you say it is his business (and none of your business), then why do you bother so much and post in the forum here, updating people about his acts and what is happening?

So what is your true intention? Well wishing? I have serious doubts about that.

We all know he will be trial inevitably, so why can't he live his life the way he chooses to be happy until the time comes?

Whats right or wrong, we let the court decide then.

His life is an open book to those only he trust alot. He has never potray himself as an angel, but shares his adventures with them and we laugh about it.

So what you heard or you think you know very much, I already know more than you do, way before you did.

You are talking to someone who has the first hand information here.

Whatever news you want to splatter here, is already old, and very unreliable.

Yours are gossips and speculations, while mine are facts.

So try something new.

We really have no time to entertain amatuers like you, who tries and wants to be someone here.

[Guest xdude]

I am one of his close friend but not the only close friend he has. With his wider range of contacts, he has many friends, but due to what had happened to him, and him being a private person, he had already filtered the people he can now trust.

Not all his friends does such stuff so, little girl, go straighten up your skirt and all your facts before posting anything here.

By accusing or generalizing all friends as such, you are indeed a slanderer.

Among his friends, some of us already know each other.

Because he is aware he is being watched and tapped by the authories very closely, he doesn't want to meet me and some of his friends for the time being, or talk over the phone for too long, fearing we the innocent parties will or maybe implicated. This is at least a thoughtful act for his friends coming from his part.

Thus, it doesnt do him or implicates anyone he knows, any harm, should he chooses to indulge in any form of activities, within his time space and limits. Now since you say it is his business (and none of your business), then why do you bother so much and post in the forum here, updating people about his acts and what is happening?

So what is your true intention? Well wishing? I have serious doubts about that.

We all know he will be trial inevitably, so why can't he live his life the way he chooses to be happy until the time comes?

Whats right or wrong, we let the court decide then.

His life is an open book to those only he trust alot. He has never potray himself as an angel, but shares his adventures with them and we laugh about it.

So what you heard or you think you know very much, I already know more than you do, way before you did.

You are talking to someone who has the first hand information here.

Whatever news you want to splatter here, is already old, and very unreliable.

Yours are gossips and speculations, while mine are facts.

So try something new.

We really have no time to entertain amatuers like you, who tries and wants to be someone here.

Bitchy and condescending again. Have you not learnt? The only thing you are doing is to piss the real neutral parties like me off.

Frankly, I rather he be proven innocent and not taint the image of the gay community. Never in my posts have I said he was guilty but there has been enough evidence that suggest that he is. And I also know for a FACT what the police have been doing and that this has been going on for years.

If Stuart is indeed clean, why is there a need to cut off ties to reduce any kinda of implication as you have suggested? Do you know how stupid you sound? You indirectly imply that he has something to hide. That is why I say, who needs enemies when you have such friends who get so aggitated and let something like this slip!

[Guest Neutral]

Bitchy and condescending again. Have you not learnt? The only thing you are doing is to piss the real neutral parties like me off.

Frankly, I rather he be proven innocent and not taint the image of the gay community. Never in my posts have I said he was guilty but there has been enough evidence that suggest that he is. And I also know for a FACT what the police have been doing and that this has been going on for years.

If Stuart is indeed clean, why is there a need to cut off ties to reduce any kinda of implication as you have suggested? Do you know how stupid you sound? You indirectly imply that he has something to hide. That is why I say, who needs enemies when you have such friends who get so aggitated and let something like this slip!

Bye Bye girl, time to go change your tampoon.

[Guest xdude]

Back to wishing him well. That is sincere. No one can truly say they have not done anything wrong before and I am certainly no angel myself.

There are things I admire about Stuart, and hence, I really rather he wasn't caught in the first place.

If anyone is really causing and stirring shit here are his so-called friends who are irritating others here by professing that Stuart is totally innocent and trying to put down people who really want to know what is going on. By the way, you can't stir shit when there isn't shit in the first place.

[Guest xdude]

Bye Bye girl, time to go change your tampoon.

lol. I thought we were just starting an interesting conversation here. looks like you need to go back to filing your nails.

[Guest Neutral]

Back to wishing him well. That is sincere. No one can truly say they have not done anything wrong before and I am certainly no angel myself.

There are things I admire about Stuart, and hence, I really rather he wasn't caught in the first place.

If anyone is really causing and stirring shit here are his so-called friends who are irritating others here by professing that Stuart is totally innocent and trying to put down people who really want to know what is going on. By the way, you can't stir shit when there isn't shit in the first place.

Not only you need to change your tampoon, you really need to clean up all the twinkle berries you left behind beneath your ass.

You dirty little girl, you didnt clean up yourself after you shit just now !!!

When you are the one who is omitting such a stench, you will accuse others of the smell, not realizing it was your own backside, which was not clean in the first place.

Thanks for adding some laughs to our lives....I must ask SK to read your postings !!!

Bye bye !!!

[Guest xdude]

Not only you need to change your tampoon, you really need to clean up all the twinkle berries you left behind beneath your ass.

You dirty little girl, you didnt clean up yourself after you shit just now !!!

When you are the one who is omitting such a stench, you will accuse others of the smell, not realizing it was your own backside, which was not clean in the first place.

Thanks for adding some laughs to our lives....I must ask SK to read your postings !!!

Bye bye !!!

I'm not ashamed to admit that I am dirty, so go ahead with your name-calling. I think Stuart would be more amused by reading YOUR attempts (with all your spelling errors and so-trying-to-be-diva language) at trying to defend him. At least it's nice to know I'm bringing some laughter to your lives

[Guest SK]

Hardy har har

ROFL

All of you make me laugh. :clap:

[Guest xdude]

Hardy har har

ROFL

All of you make me laugh. :clap:

We need more laughter in this world

[Guest neutral]

I'm not ashamed to admit that I am dirty, so go ahead with your name-calling. I think Stuart would be more amused by reading YOUR attempts (with all your spelling errors and so-trying-to-be-diva language) at trying to defend him. At least it's nice to know I'm bringing some laughter to your lives

Who you think SK will side? You or me?

Mine, not a diva. But if you think I am one, thats because you feel so small about yourself.

We never had any interesting conversation to start off with.

It was you who started telling everyone what happened to him recently, what you think you about him and his friends, and what he has being doing lately.

If you are smart if you so bright, you will already know, in this thread, he is very hated disliked and judge harshly by people who don't know their facts or really know what happened.

Your posting does not serve any purpose here, except adding fuel to the fire.

This thread has been quiet for awhile, until you came here and post your nonsense and speculations.

Retrace re-read all your postings, and you will realize what shit you are stirring here.

If you admire some of SK's work, or is his well wisher, you will be very careful what you post and blare out here.

This is an open forum. I won't be surprised the authories are reading this, just to extract any comments, which could be used as possible evidences against him.

So use your brain little girl, and don't be the smart clown who is trying to make us laugh, but end up messing things

[Guest xdude]

Who you think SK will side? You or me?

Mine, not a diva. But if you think I am one, thats because you feel so small about yourself.

We never had any interesting conversation to start off with.

It was you who started telling everyone what happened to him recently, what you think you about him and his friends, and what he has being doing lately.

If you are smart if you so bright, you will already know, in this thread, he is very hated disliked and judge harshly by people who don't know their facts or really know what happened.

Your posting does not serve any purpose here, except adding fuel to the fire.

This thread has been quiet for awhile, until you came here and post your nonsense and speculations.

Retrace re-read all your postings, and you will realize what shit you are stirring here.

If you admire some of SK's work, or is his well wisher, you will be very careful what you post and blare out here.

This is an open forum. I won't be surprised the authories are reading this, just to extract any comments, which could be used as possible evidences against him.

So use your brain little girl, and don't be the smart clown who is trying to make us laugh, but end up messing things

1.Who you think SK will side? You or me?

Finding your attempts laughable has nothing to do with whether he sides with you or not. It was just a suggestion that your posts here might be more amusing to him.

2.Mine, not a diva. But if you think I am one, thats because you feel so small about yourself.

I never said you were a diva, but your language suggests you are trying so hard to be one.

3.It was you who started telling everyone what happened to him recently, what you think you about him and his friends, and what he has being doing lately.

If you are smart if you so bright, you will already know, in this thread, he is very hated disliked and judge harshly by people who don't know their facts or really know what happened.

Your posting does not serve any purpose here, except adding fuel to the fire.

This thread has been quiet for awhile, until you came here and post your nonsense and speculations....blah blah blah

This is an open forum. Things have been quiet, but not forgotten. It may be true he is hated or disliked by people who don't know facts but it is also true that he is hated and disliked by those who DO KNOW facts and what has happened. I feel my posts have been as neutral as possible. I have not outright accused him of being guilty, nor have I ever once said that Stuart is a bad person.

I was simply wondering what was happening since the news was out. This may be a personal case to you but there are implications on the gay community as well. Arn't we all entitled to know what has happened or not happened since? In what way is this stirring shit?

There is nothing the authorities can use here against him unless people are posting facts and evidence which are incriminatory. So why are YOU making a fuss out of nothing? It only suggests guilt and fear. Your responses are currently doing Stuart no justice.

[Guest Neutral]

1.Who you think SK will side? You or me?

Finding your attempts laughable has nothing to do with whether he sides with you or not. It was just a suggestion that your posts here might be more amusing to him.

2.Mine, not a diva. But if you think I am one, thats because you feel so small about yourself.

I never said you were a diva, but your language suggests you are trying so hard to be one.

3.It was you who started telling everyone what happened to him recently, what you think you about him and his friends, and what he has being doing lately.

If you are smart if you so bright, you will already know, in this thread, he is very hated disliked and judge harshly by people who don't know their facts or really know what happened.

Your posting does not serve any purpose here, except adding fuel to the fire.

This thread has been quiet for awhile, until you came here and post your nonsense and speculations....blah blah blah

This is an open forum. Things have been quiet, but not forgotten. It may be true he is hated or disliked by people who don't know facts but it is also true that he is hated and disliked by those who DO KNOW facts and what has happened. I feel my posts have been as neutral as possible. I have not outright accused him of being guilty, nor have I ever once said that Stuart is a bad person.

I was simply wondering what was happening since the news was out. This may be a personal case to you but there are implications on the gay community as well. Arn't we all entitled to know what has happened or not happened since? In what way is this stirring shit?

There is nothing the authorities can use here against him unless people are posting facts and evidence which are incriminatory. So why are YOU making a fuss out of nothing? It only suggests guilt and fear. Your responses are currently doing Stuart no justice.

I just sms him and he just sms me back and he told me he read your postings.

He thinks you are as smart as a Blonde.

Or the most, a Blonde is smarter than you.

All your psotings, so sweet and long......what a waste.

[Guest xdude]

I just sms him and he just sms me back and he told me he read your postings.

He thinks you are as smart as a Blonde.

Or the most, a Blonde is smarter than you.

All your psotings, so sweet and long......what a waste.

Such replies only serves to reinforce the fact that Stuart is better off not having friends like you posting on his behalf. Putting others down or at least trying to do so, only reveals your character. Personally, I doubt Stuart is that stupid to come up with such a reply. Stu probably asked you to ignore me and stop replying. That would have been the wisest thing to do. Feel free to accuse me of being stupid. How can I possibly measure up to one with a doctorate?

[Guest Neutral]

Such replies only serves to reinforce the fact that Stuart is better off not having friends like you posting on his behalf. Putting others down or at least trying to do so, only reveals your character. Personally, I doubt Stuart is that stupid to come up with such a reply. Stu probably asked you to ignore me and stop replying. That would have been the wisest thing to do. Feel free to accuse me of being stupid. How can I possibly measure up to one with a doctorate?

Since you can't measure up to the standards of a doctorate, and do yourself a favour and do what you do best. Just be a natural blonde

And you really think I am lying and joking when I told just told you we are in close contact , and that after receving my sms, he read your posting and told me what he thinks of you.

Infact he was the one who told me to tell you, you are a Blonde. Which means I have his approval for posting on his behalf

The truth is being shown into your face and you can continue to prattle like a Blonde for all we care..

Blonde is certainly your nature, and a colour that suits you best, but sorry little girl, thats certainly not our cup of tea.

[Guest xdude]

Since you can't measure up to the standards of a doctorate, and do yourself a favour and do what you do best. Just be a natural blonde

And you really think I am lying and joking when I told just told you we are in close contact , and that after receving my sms, he read your posting and told me what he thinks of you.

Infact he was the one who told me to tell you, you are a Blonde. Which means I have his approval for posting on his behalf

The truth is being shown into your face and you can continue to prattle like a Blonde for all we care..

Blonde is certainly your nature, and a colour that suits you best, but sorry little girl, thats certainly not our cup of tea.

Blondes have more fun

Seriously though, I respect Stu's intelligence too much to believe you are actually posting on his behalf. And just read your replies again. Do you know how childish, petty and silly you sound?

BTW, I didn't bring up this post. #178 from curious was the one who dug this out from the grave. I only responded with an observation. It is "Guest" and yourself who have started and continued this "nonsense". Which brings back to my point that you guys are doing him more harm than good.

[Guest Neutral]

Blondes have more fun

Seriously though, I respect Stu's intelligence too much to believe you are actually posting on his behalf. And just read your replies again. Do you know how childish, petty and silly you sound?

BTW, I didn't bring up this post. #178 from curious was the one who dug this out from the grave. I only responded with an observation. It is "Guest" and yourself who have started and continued this "nonsense". Which brings back to my point that you guys are doing him more harm than good.

Blondes are more fun because they are naturally more dumb than the rest of the colours

Oh I dont have to read any of my previous postings.

Neither would anyone really bother to read yours, because if they do, they will become as blonde as you.

For we both just conclude awhile ago you are a natural Blonde.

Bye.

Period

[Guest Guest]

Stop fighting over me boys.

Xdude must be quite a hottie since I evidently sent him my nude photo and asked him for sex (I only have sex with hotties) (btw gimme your number again - I can't find your message on DN)

And since CNB has been asking his friends about me, we obviously share many of the same friends (and maybe the same "pasttimes"?...oh yeah he says he's dirty too...)...

Neutral, Xdude and me should all chill out together and have a good time.

[Guest Stu aka SK]

Oh, forgot to sign off.

Stop fighting over me boys.

Xdude must be quite a hottie since I evidently sent him my nude photo and asked him for sex (I only have sex with hotties) (btw gimme your number again - I can't find your message on DN)

And since CNB has been asking his friends about me, we obviously share many of the same friends (and maybe the same "pasttimes"?...oh yeah he says he's dirty too...)...

Neutral, Xdude and me should all chill out together and have a good time.

"SK" aka "Stu"

ps Neutral - text me later la! You never reply one.

[Guest Neutral]

Oh, forgot to sign off.

"SK" aka "Stu"

ps Neutral - text me later la! You never reply one.

Aiyah where got time to reply you, when I am here spending so much time, fighting off so many Blondes who are against you.

U think i got so much time in the world like you meh, can go xtube dudenude gaytube or whatever tube you like meh ???

Btw, many of your kapo fans here still wonder and would like to know if u in prison yet or not???!!!

If u in prison now, they must be giving u royalty treatment lor. Or else how can u access to internet , go dudenude and hook up a Blonde there called Xdude??? hee??

LOL !!!

[Guest Curious]

Aiyah where got time to reply you, when I am here spending so much time, fighting off so many Blondes who are against you.

U think i got so much time in the world like you meh, can go xtube dudenude gaytube or whatever tube you like meh ???

Btw, many of your kapo fans here still wonder and would like to know if u in prison yet or not???!!!

If u in prison now, they must be giving u royalty treatment lor. Or else how can u access to internet , go dudenude and hook up a Blonde there called Xdude??? hee??

LOL !!!

Yes, I'm still wondering. What's the sentencing against him?

[Guest dunno]

Yes, I'm still wondering. What's the sentencing against him?

No news. And it seems like SK supporters rather this being hushed up.

[Willy]

An unemployed man was on Tuesday jailed 18 months and given four strokes of the cane for molesting two teenage boys.

Twenty—three—year—old Kelvin Yeo Gao Wei made friends with one his victims, a 15—year—old student, in September last year.

Yeo subsequently asked the boy to perform a sexual act in his presence on September 22.

He also told the boy he would gather his friends to hunt him down should the youngster refuse to do so.

The teenager agreed to meet Yeo after school on September 23, 2009 for fear of being hurt.

Yeo then brought him to a male toilet at Delta Sports Complex and molested him.

By using similar threats, Yeo managed to lure another boy to his flat at Block 107, Commonwealth Crescent on December 29 last year.

The 14—year—old student went there at around 11.40pm. Yeo then instructed him to remove his trousers before molesting him.

Yeo also warned the boy not to notify anybody about the incident.

The student told the police on January 6 this year, about his ordeal and Yeo was arrested.

For molesting the boys, Yeo could have been jailed up to five years and fined or caned for each charge.

[chubby_guy00]

so many willing guys around why corrupt young boys..

[Guest Serve him right]

He deserve it. Be it intentionally or not, no one should make a threat to another person life

[Guest darkflame]

Poor him.

Too bad he developed the fetish of 'educating' uninitiated adolescent boys by blurring his own line b/w pxxn & reality.

Thanks to him, we will have more homophobes showing up again.

[fab]

Hope he learns his lessons well.

[upshot]

For the duration of his incarceration, he is going to be just fine being everyone's bitch. Unlike the boy, he can tell everyone about it.I pray he likes being a bitch.

I know I do LOL...

[Guest Thaiboyz]

Dun understand why he need to do such act?

There are several saunas attended by young boys, some of them can be cute and hunky too. Of course they hv to be at least 18. He should go there to lure these boys then. No such problem when two willing adults having fun

[patisoy]

Dun understand why he need to do such act?

There are several saunas attended by young boys, some of them can be cute and hunky too. Of course they hv to be at least 18. He should go there to lure these boys then. No such problem when two willing adults having fun

[Guest Thaboyz]

Can't afford saunas? Also cannot anyhow molest young boys rite? Hmm sell himself to old men first lor then enjoy later in saunas.

[Guest guest]

We should not take advantage and have fun with teenages

[chubby_guy00]

if those boys want gay sex they will not complain.. they wil come back for more.. i know as i used to be one of them.. i got my first oral sex at 15 yo..i never tell.. just look for more.

[TheVisitors]

Hemm.

I was 14, he was 25. I met him during my waterpolo school training days at the pool. He was from a team from one of the Universities here.

The building which he dragged me up at knife point, and was subseqently XXXX by him, has long being demolished.

Occasionally I still pass by the site where the building once stood.

Its being like almost 21 years ago.

Strangley enough, reading this thread, makes me wonder how he looks like now.

Just wanna say, if you are the one reading this, I have forgiven you, to what you have once did to me.

Live and let live.

[Guest Thaiboyz]

Oh dear! Considered got raped? Or you enjoyed recalling those moments with him? If so you should try to get connect with him and who knows you will enjoy another rounds. Surely would be more thrilling this round after so many years as both parties should hv gained more experience in the art of sexual acts.

[Ordinary]

Hemm.

I was 14, he was 25. I met him during my waterpolo school training days at the pool. He was from a team from one of the Universities here.

The building which he dragged me up at knife point, and was subseqently XXXX by him, has long being demolished.

Occasionally I still pass by the site where the building once stood.

Its being like almost 21 years ago.

Strangley enough, reading this thread, makes me wonder how he looks like now.

Just wanna say, if you are the one reading this, I have forgiven you, to what you have once did to me.

Live and let live.

Good to forgive. The good thing is that you have grown up to be such a desirable specimen for our gay mankind.

[GachiMuchi]

I think all those who prey on young guys should be dealt with. That said, with the proliferation of the internet. Lots of youngsters below the legal age are out there to prey on older guys too.

So, guys. Use your brain and not your little brother to think. Avoid youngsters.

[zonnieboy]

An unemployed man was on Tuesday jailed 18 months.... twenty—three—year—old Kelvin Yeo Gao Wei

imagine the 'fun' he'll be having in jail?

when the mates find out how he got behind bars... : )

[Guest Vanessa]

You guys are so busybody. The victim actually was willingly to do that, it's both at fault. Don't blame it to only one person. Idiots. He is willing to change, a person should forgive and forget. Why are you guys so busy body talking about him? Get a life please. Gay also human beings alright. Bunch of pussy. Thanks so much. Stop talking about this topic. Love you guys.

[Guest passby]

AN OPERATIONS admin worker was fined $3,000 on Wednesday after being caught engaging in oral sex with another man in a shopping mall toilet cubicle.

On March 9, police received a call from a waiter working at a nearby cafe complaining of two middle-aged Chinese men having oral sex in the toilet.

The waiter was in the toilet when he heard 'moaning and groaning' from the first and second cubicles.

His colleague recorded the incident on video, which showed the pair engaging in oral sex. The complainant then called the police. But the pair left the toilet before the police came.

Shortly, another two men - Chin Chee Shyong, 40, and Tan Eng Hong, 47, entered the same public toilet. The complainant again called the police, who arrived on the scene and confronted the two, asking them to come out of the cubicle.

Sensing a delay, Sergeant Mohd Faizal Bin Rosli climbed on top of the toilet bowl in the third cubicle and saw Tan, wearing only his shirt, throwing an unrolled condom into the toilet bowl. Sgt Faizal told Tan not to flush and to open the door.

When Tan opened the door, Sgt Faizal climbed on top of the toilet bowl in the second cubicle and saw Chin putting on his socks. When grilled by police, Tan admitted to performing fellatio on Chin. The two were arrested.

Chin was found guilty of performing an obscene act in a public place and fined $3,000. Tan has yet to be sentenced.

http://www.straitstimes.com/BreakingNews/Singapore/Story/STIStory_601542.html

[Guest surelyugessian]

whoa, i get a hard on yesterday reading about those two middle-aged Chinese men having oral sex in the toilet.

if you those ah peks, why not contact me? i like a oral threesome. anal fxxk also welcome!

[Mohd_Ben]

For $3K u can book a room many times for 2 hours and it's more privacy...

[HendryTan]

1. The man Chin was originally charged under Section 377A.

His lawyer filed to challenge the legality of Section 377A in Singapore High Court - http://www.blowingwind.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=18905

2. The charge was reduce to Section 294 of the Penal Code after representation to the Attorney-General's Chambers.

3. Alex Au aka YawningBread wrote about it at http://yawningbread.wordpress.com/2010/11/10/the-377a-hide-and-seek/

I quote his article below.

The 377A hide-and-seek

Published 10 November 2010

http://yawningbread....-hide-and-seek/

On 10 November 2010, Chin Chee Shyong was fined S$3,000 for an “obscene act” in a public place. He had originally been charged under the infamous Section 377A of the Penal Code, but after representations were made to the Attorney-General’s Chambers by his lawyer and others, the charge was reduced to one under Section 294 of the Penal Code, which reads:

294. Whoever, to the annoyance of others —

(a) does any obscene act in any public place; or

(b) sings, recites or utters any obscene song, ballad or words in or near any public place,

shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to 3 months, or with fine, or with both.

Attending the court hearing this morning, the following was what I gathered about the facts of the case:

On 9 March 2010, two waiters from the restaurant called New York, New York in the underground Citylink Mall called the police when, around 9 p.m., they spotted two men in adjacent toilet cubicles having oral sex under the lavatory partitions. The waiters’ attention had been drawn by sounds of moaning.

Apparently, this was not the first time they had noticed such incidents. This time however, one of the waiters video’d what he saw.

By the time the police arrived, the two men had left, so the police told the waiters to call them once more should the men be seen again.

The men were not seen again, but another two men happened to use the same public toilet for sex, not long after. They too used separate cubicles, but one reached (crawled?) under the partition to the other and fellatio took place.

What was not clear from the statement of facts read out in court was how the waiters came to notice these other two. Were they watching the toilet closely in the hope of seeing the first two again? Probably, I would think.

Naturally, they called the police again and this time, the second pair of men — Chin and Tan Eng Hong — were still in the toilet when the officers arrived. The two were caught and Tan admitted to performing oral sex in his police statement.

Both Tan and Chin were charged under Section 377A.

However, a few weeks ago, the Deputy Public Prosecutor (DPP) reduced the charge for both to one under Section 294. According to Tan’s lawyer, M Ravi, the DPP explained to the judge that they were doing this “as a matter of public policy” (Ravi said I could quote him as recollecting those words by the DPP), an expression that M Ravi took to indicate that the Attorney-General’s Chambers would not be using Section 377A again for similar incidents.

However, Chin’s lawyer, who attended the same pre-trial conference, did not recall the DPP using any expression like that. If the DPP had used such an expression, it would certainly have pricked his ears, he said. Referring to his notes, he said the DPP merely said that after considering the facts, they were “recalibrating” the charge to one under Section 294.

I am now not certain what significance one should give to this turn of events.

Anyway, Tan’s case will come up later this month. It is not yet clear if he plans to plead guilty.

* * * * *

Prior to the DPP lowering the charge, M Ravi, who is well-known in Singapore for adopting an aggressive position on behalf of his clients, had told the court at the very first court mention of this case that he intended to challenge the constitutionality of Section 377A.

Subsequently, he followed up with an Originating Summons, the first few lines of which says,

Section 377A of the Penal Code is inconsistent with Article 9 of the Constitution, and is therefore void by virtue of Article 4 of the Constitution; and Section 377A is inconsistent with Articles 9 and 14 of the Constitution, and is therefore void by virtue of Article 4 of the Constitution; and for these reasons the charge brought against the accused under Section 377A is void.

What are Articles 4, 9 and 14 of the Constitution?

Article 4 says that the Constitution is the supreme law in Singapore and any act of the legislature that is inconsistent with the Constitution is void.

Article 9 is relatively long, the first sentence of which says “No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty save in accordance with law”.

Article 14 guarantees the freedom of speech, assembly and association subject to this and that.

The High Court date for the constitutional challenge, which runs separately from the Section 294 charge against Tan, is set for 7 December 2010. I am given to understand that the Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) will be asking the High Court to dismiss this challenge on the ground that there is no outstanding charge under Section 377A for Tan to answer.

M Ravi is going to dispute this line of reasoning. His argument is likely to be as follows:

If the High Court allows this as grounds for dismissing his constitutional challenge, then it effectively says that no legislation can be challenged, however adverse the effects it has on people, unless it is brought by someone being prosecuted under it.

Such a narrow window of opportunity is unreasonable and does not adequately serve the interest of justice. Laws can have effects even when no prosecution results; is one to say that short of being prosecuted, no one can ever challenge the constitutionality of any piece of legislation?

For example, let’s suppose Parliament passed a law that says only females aged 40 and above can be granted a licence to do a certain kind of business. The government thus routinely refuses to issue such licences to younger women and men who also wish to carry on such a business. Because no one wants to take the risk of being charged and going to jail for conducting a business without the requisite licence, no one openly flouts the law, in which case no one is actually prosecuted.

Is there no route open to anyone affected by the law (i.e. younger women and men) to challenge it? Should our courts take the view that since Mr A or Miss B has not been prosecuted for flouting the law, they have no right to challenge it? Wouldn’t that be the same as saying, too bad, if Parliament deprives you of the equal right to conduct this kind of business, you’ll just have to lump it?

Same with Section 377A: it has effects even when no one is being prosecuted. One direct effect is when the Education Ministry (MOE) refuses to allow any other sex education but that which paints homosexuality in a negative light. Right up there in its Sexuality Education guidelines is the requirement that providers must stress that “homosexual acts are illegal”, and that the “MOE does not . . . promote homosexuality”. As we all know in Singapore, “not promote” is a euphemism that is taken to mean that no positive or even neutral speech about homosexual orientation is to be allowed. Any and all discussion of homosexual orientation must paint it in negative light. Does that not undermine the self-confidence and self-esteem of the gay teenager? Does that not perpetuate the stigma and prejudice held by his peers, who will grow up to be adults?

Another effect, albeit indirect, of Section 377A, is unequal censorship. After the Education Ministry has made its strenuous efforts to perpetuate prejudice, the Information Ministry then says, oh look, the majority of Singaporeans dislike encountering gay-positive characters and themes in media; that being the case, we have a popular mandate to censor out anything that makes gay people look good. The censorship and resulting bias in media portrayal in turn reinforce that same stigma and prejudice, leading to job discrimination and the overall second-class position for gay people in society.

Are our courts going to say that no recourse is open to anyone so affected until he has been caught and charged under Section 377A?

Well, we shall see what happens in December when this motion by the AGC to dismiss is heard.

[metalmickey]

His colleague recorded the incident on video, which showed the pair engaging in oral sex. The complainant then called the police. But the pair left the toilet before the police came.

When Tan opened the door, Sgt Faizal climbed on top of the toilet bowl in the second cubicle and saw Chin putting on his socks. When grilled by police, Tan admitted to performing fellatio on Chin. The two were arrested.

Chin was found guilty of performing an obscene act in a public place and fined $3,000. Tan has yet to be sentenced.

http://www.straitstimes.com/BreakingNews/Singapore/Story/STIStory_601542.html

Recording other people engaged in sexual intercourse - isn't this a violation of privacy and also illegal? Also, the two could have gotten away without being prosecuted if they never confessed to the cop what they had actually done. By confessing, that's all the cop needed to prove that they were violating section 377A, or else the cop finding either man in various stages of undress and one with a condom would just be deemed as circumstantial evidence and not conclusive evidence to prosecute the two. Also, the two could have protested that the cop and the waiter were violating their individual rights to privacy by peeping at them and so in fact, the cop and the waiter were the offenders, and not these two men who were acting in their individual private capacity within a private space in public designed to protect an individual's privacy.

Brothers, know your rights first before you allow yourselves to give in to unjust or ultra vires demands.

Edited November 12, 2010 by metalmickey

[Guest Agree]

Recording other people engaged in sexual intercourse - isn't this a violation of privacy and also illegal? Also, the two could have gotten away without being prosecuted if they never confessed to the cop what they had actually done. By confessing, that's all the cop needed to prove that they were violating section 377A, or else the cop finding either man in various stages of undress and one with a condom would just be deemed as circumstantial evidence and not conclusive evidence to prosecute the two. Also, the two could have protested that the cop and the waiter were violating their individual rights to privacy by peeping at them and so in fact, the cop and the waiter were the offenders, and not these two men who were acting in their individual private capacity within a private space in public designed to protect an individual's privacy.

Brothers, know your rights first before you allow yourselves to give in to unjust or ultra vires demands.

Yes! Unless they catch you red handed, there is NO law that says 2 men cannot be in the same toilet cubicle. But sometimes one would be too traumatised to think and stupidly admit to committing an offence.

[Guest Thaiboyz]

I think the two men enjoying themselves in gory hole fun.

Whatever, never do in public lah. Not worth!