oralb Posted March 5, 2020 Report Share Posted March 5, 2020 troll alert found in the earlier post... Quote When I Think It, I Do It, I Win It! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Yum Posted March 5, 2020 Report Share Posted March 5, 2020 12 hours ago, Guest Six said: Wonder how does the 24yo thai looks like. Probably hot and handsome till the namsri couldn't resist sucking his sleeping cock the younger generation of thai chinese are very very yummy. just look at their pics on instagram, good looking, fit bodies and hot! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oralb Posted March 5, 2020 Report Share Posted March 5, 2020 points to note - it is non-consensual - involving a sexual act on a sex organ, which made it much higher than outrage of modesty or molestation. So yes, certain stories shared in the forum should be read as fantasy. Quote When I Think It, I Do It, I Win It! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeanMature Posted March 5, 2020 Report Share Posted March 5, 2020 He probably arranged himself to share room with the 24yo. It's premeditated. Quote Don't read and response to guests' post Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
singalion Posted March 5, 2020 Report Share Posted March 5, 2020 It doesn't matter if Thai boys or Thai Chinese / Chinese mix boys are yummy, because you don't approach anyone or do any sexual advances to anyone who doesn't want or did not consent prior to the sex. You don't excuse your uncontrolled behaviour with good looks of the victim. There is always a problem of two sides of the story in such situations. But I take some pointers. the New Paper article seems more informative. Looking at the case, the victim made the effort to seek advise at the Thai Embassy prior to making the police report. You wouldn't take such initiative if there had not been anything. It doesn't even matter if the victim is gay or not. You don't impose your sexual advances on a sleeping man who can't give his consent. That is an act of gross misjudgment by the accused. He was a sexual predator who simply did not control his lust and imposed his sexual desire onto the victim. Even if you sleep in the same room with the hottest boy in town, you must pull your both hands together in such situations . How often did it happen, you were standing at the check in counter of a hotel, the airport check in, in a restaurant and were confronted by a hot looking dude you have been dreaming your whole life. You wouldn't grab his dick in such situations, if yes you would need some counseling. Please note the accused pleaded guilty. I m aware sometimes you don't have the financial stamina to go through a trial and defend yourself. But most pointers hint to me the victim was not putting up a fake story. He won't receive any compensation and still had the hassle to attend the trial. And if he is straight I can completely understand the victim for reporting the tour guide/ coordinator. You simply don't touch the private parts of anyone else without asking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest STF Posted March 5, 2020 Report Share Posted March 5, 2020 2 hours ago, Guest Yum said: the younger generation of thai chinese are very very yummy. just look at their pics on instagram, good looking, fit bodies and hot! Hussssh!!!! You are encouraging Sxxx5xx0 to commit a crime. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yag123123 Posted March 5, 2020 Report Share Posted March 5, 2020 (edited) 5 hours ago, Guest Guest said: judge is male. prosecutor is female. What If...... Instead of performing sextual acts on the person He just masturbated ... Scenario 1 At wee hours in the morning...realised the guy is masturbating furiously at his own bed(not the victim's).... Accompanied with a heavy duty 12 inch black dildo..that has quite loud vibrating sounds (worr....worr...sounds) Scenario 2 At wee hours in the morning... Realised the guy is masturbating furiously right at the victim's face... Then as the guy turns away to cum on the floor ..but the victim,due to the shock..gets up,trips and fell from the blanket and landed right at the sweet spot...and the guy came on the victim face... The victim , due to shock and rage, screams and loads of sperm went into his mouth..as he taste and smell, the victim starts to gag and vomit..that is when the victim realised that he is having a raging hard on throughout the whole situation Edited March 5, 2020 by yag123123 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted March 5, 2020 Report Share Posted March 5, 2020 Quote Chalermnarong went to bed after him. When the other man’s alarm clock went off at about 5am, Chalermnarong woke up but his roommate was still sleeping. He then went over, lifted the man’s blanket and pulled down his shorts to stroke his private parts. Deputy Public Prosecutor (DPP) Grace Teo told the court: “At this point, the victim reached under his blanket and grasped the accused’s hand. Thinking it was a dream, the victim let go.” Chalermnarong then went on to sexually assault the man. After a few minutes, the victim woke up, tugged his shorts up and pulled the blanket up to his neck. very suay, he probably thought that the young man gave his consensus when he grasped his hand and yet let go. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Masc btm Posted March 5, 2020 Report Share Posted March 5, 2020 In Thailand they are very liberal about gay sex. If you've been to straight massage you'll know. He forgot this is sg and our people here are uptight about a little sex. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted March 5, 2020 Report Share Posted March 5, 2020 Straight man took upskirt pictures of CB multiple times only jailed 44 weeks. But gay man stroke cock of straight man jailed 5 years 6 months and cane somemore!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted March 5, 2020 Report Share Posted March 5, 2020 1 hour ago, Guest Masc btm said: In Thailand they are very liberal about gay sex. If you've been to straight massage you'll know. He forgot this is sg and our people here are uptight about a little sex. both of them are thai Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Masc btm Posted March 5, 2020 Report Share Posted March 5, 2020 22 minutes ago, Guest Guest said: both of them are thai That's right, he thought that that man got reaction then got chance to go further. Even if the man don't like it, Thais normally don't make a big fuss and even if he make a police report, its not serious like in Thailand. This kind of want and don't want I also pretend when the masseur test fingering me because I don't want to pay the very expensive extra service. If he used force then I never consent then don't expect me to pay for violating me. Most times they already aroused because expecting it happen then cannot stop when already hard. Of course they know I pretend pretend only but we all men we know, the more I resist the more they want to take me. The best is when they bang until I cry mother cry father and people outside thought he won the battle because I'm masculine they thought the masseur must be very powerful. Then Thais thinks this is quite normal. Try try no harm. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fridays Posted March 5, 2020 Report Share Posted March 5, 2020 14 hours ago, singalion said: It doesn't matter if Thai boys or Thai Chinese / Chinese mix boys are yummy, because you don't approach anyone or do any sexual advances to anyone who doesn't want or did not consent prior to the sex. You don't excuse your uncontrolled behaviour with good looks of the victim. There is always a problem of two sides of the story in such situations. But I take some pointers. the New Paper article seems more informative. Looking at the case, the victim made the effort to seek advise at the Thai Embassy prior to making the police report. You wouldn't take such initiative if there had not been anything. It doesn't even matter if the victim is gay or not. You don't impose your sexual advances on a sleeping man who can't give his consent. That is an act of gross misjudgment by the accused. He was a sexual predator who simply did not control his lust and imposed his sexual desire onto the victim. Even if you sleep in the same room with the hottest boy in town, you must pull your both hands together in such situations . How often did it happen, you were standing at the check in counter of a hotel, the airport check in, in a restaurant and were confronted by a hot looking dude you have been dreaming your whole life. You wouldn't grab his dick in such situations, if yes you would need some counseling. Please note the accused pleaded guilty. I m aware sometimes you don't have the financial stamina to go through a trial and defend yourself. But most pointers hint to me the victim was not putting up a fake story. He won't receive any compensation and still had the hassle to attend the trial. And if he is straight I can completely understand the victim for reporting the tour guide/ coordinator. You simply don't touch the private parts of anyone else without asking. yes, you have just stated the most important point - Never touch other private parts without asking for consent. rule of thumb - ask before action In the eye of law, offence is still alway an offence - unless get a lawyer to fight all the way through and also the victim never realise the worst consequence of the other guy - but i m sure he sure worry and guilt of being revenge by his family or friends with sleepless night. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted March 6, 2020 Report Share Posted March 6, 2020 4 hours ago, Fridays said: yes, you have just stated the most important point - Never touch other private parts without asking for consent. rule of thumb - ask before action In the eye of law, offence is still alway an offence - unless get a lawyer to fight all the way through and also the victim never realise the worst consequence of the other guy - but i m sure he sure worry and guilt of being revenge by his family or friends with sleepless night. 5 1/2 yearsband cane is too hard. Did the 'victim' get hard? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Oh Please Posted March 6, 2020 Report Share Posted March 6, 2020 On 3/5/2020 at 2:36 AM, Guest Guest said: Poor namsri. Why did the MSM always have to publish his full name! I am so angry with Straights Times right now! What has ST against the LGBTQIA+ community? Why must hotel even named? They cam just report the news without his full name! They include his nationality as well! What will happen to his family? I cannot imagine the grief Namsri's family will suffer! If ST did not name his full name, his family can just say he go overseas work! Now everyone will know namsri is in jail! I created the following hashtag for it to go viral so thay namsri will be strong in these few years and his family will know they are in our thoughts and prayers. #IStandWithNamsri #BeStrongNamsri #BeBraveNamsri #NoFearNamsri #BelieveInNamsri #PrayForNamsri #YouTheBestNamsri #WeSupportYouNamsri #YouAreLovedNamsri Stop pretending to be victimised. They also reported names of crimes committed by straights too. He committed the crime and he has to bear the consequences of his actions and be exposed. LGBT Community should be ridded of people like you who encourage and sympathize with such people. I believe the harsh sentence was because he performed oral sex on the fellow : "On Tuesday, DPP Teo told District Judge Chay Yuen Fatt that Namsri had exposed the victim to the risk of sexually transmitted diseases by performing unprotected oral sex on him." At the end of the day, while it is entertaining to read the sexual encounters posted in the thread, I think we have to do a reality check that we can't presume that the other guy will enjoy being molested/touched or even being given blow job, straight or gay. The rule of thumb is don't initiate any actions on any man who does not give you indications that he's interested. I have seen those discussions on sexual encounters on foreign workers, straight guys, delivery guys, seductions on landlords/ tenants. I hope you guys know what you are in for when you want to initiate those sexcapades encounters that others posted in the forum whose encounters are unverified, dubious and too good to be true. Please think seriously of the consequences before you embark the road of no return. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Hot dog Posted March 6, 2020 Report Share Posted March 6, 2020 So many years in jail and canning some more... I rather go buy dildo and suck it if horny. If at night no dildo wake up horny, go fridge take out sausages and suck it! But must cook it or else suck raw cold sausage will get sick or not.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted March 6, 2020 Report Share Posted March 6, 2020 On 3/3/2020 at 8:03 PM, Guest News Reader said: Yet another news article to remind fellow BW members and guests to differentiate between the fictitious sexual fantasies encounters posted in the forum vs the cold hard reality out there and consequences if they decided to think with their dicks instead of their logical brain. Yea this is really a good warning. Some gays keep thinking that straight guys can be bent or dun mind being sexually involved / having fun with another man. Big No! Many straight guys are just disgusted by it, i mean, would you wanna have fun with another gal? Similar logic Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted March 6, 2020 Report Share Posted March 6, 2020 More guys are receptive towards gays nowadays, as friends, colleagues, etc... but that does not mean they can accept sexual acts with males. Yes please do not get misled by fictional stories on someone got into a chance of having sex with a straight man, and boast about his enjoyment. 5.5 years jail terms is really a very harsh sentence... take this as a warning for all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Masc btm Posted March 6, 2020 Report Share Posted March 6, 2020 1 hour ago, Guest Guest said: Yea this is really a good warning. Some gays keep thinking that straight guys can be bent or dun mind being sexually involved / having fun with another man. Big No! Many straight guys are just disgusted by it, i mean, would you wanna have fun with another gal? Similar logic True, unless they get paid for it. I know it's less thrilling but some are as straight as you can get. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ;)) Posted March 6, 2020 Report Share Posted March 6, 2020 Get sex doll better, more realistic, can bite nipple & french kiss too.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ;)) Posted March 6, 2020 Report Share Posted March 6, 2020 8 hours ago, Guest Hot dog said: So many years in jail and canning some more... I rather go buy dildo and suck it if horny. If at night no dildo wake up horny, go fridge take out sausages and suck it! But must cook it or else suck raw cold sausage will get sick or not.. Get sex doll better, more realistic, can bite nipple & french kiss too.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fab Posted March 6, 2020 Report Share Posted March 6, 2020 (edited) 8 hours ago, Guest Guest said: Yea this is really a good warning. Some gays keep thinking that straight guys can be bent or dun mind being sexually involved / having fun with another man. Big No! Many straight guys are just disgusted by it, i mean, would you wanna have fun with another gal? Similar logic Except those commercialise ones who get paid to be touched. Straight guys accepting gays us the same as gays accepting fag hats. That'sall. Edited March 6, 2020 by fab Quote 鍾意就好，理佢男定女 never argue with the guests. let them bark all they want. 结缘不结怨 解怨不解缘 After I have said what I wanna say, I don't care what you say. 看穿不说穿 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fab Posted March 6, 2020 Report Share Posted March 6, 2020 6 hours ago, Guest Masc btm said: True, unless they get paid for it. I know it's less thrilling but some are as straight as you can get. Straight but can't stand is useless. Quote 鍾意就好，理佢男定女 never argue with the guests. let them bark all they want. 结缘不结怨 解怨不解缘 After I have said what I wanna say, I don't care what you say. 看穿不说穿 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest straights hit Posted March 6, 2020 Report Share Posted March 6, 2020 Those who think this porn stuff on a straight allowing a gay to suck the straight for money is true,... come on. And the one writing about Thai straight guys being more tolerant, I think you are ignorant. Even in gay friendly European countries, a straight guy might hit you into the face because he feels offended by your actions. and that can be simply by looking at him. There is sufficient gay food available, no need to hit on straight guys. Be careful and don't risk anything Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted March 6, 2020 Report Share Posted March 6, 2020 26 minutes ago, Guest straights hit said: Those who think this porn stuff on a straight allowing a gay to suck the straight for money is true,... come on. And the one writing about Thai straight guys being more tolerant, I think you are ignorant. Even in gay friendly European countries, a straight guy might hit you into the face because he feels offended by your actions. and that can be simply by looking at him. There is sufficient gay food available, no need to hit on straight guys. Be careful and don't risk anything Isnt Europeans very tolerant towards human rights and gays? They allow gays to be married, buy house etc so how can europeans hit a gay simply by looking? Please do not spread propaganda to make singapore look good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest News Reader Posted March 6, 2020 Report Share Posted March 6, 2020 The law here does not discriminate between gays and straights as one ignorant guest claimed. This straight guy suffered worse fate, heavier sentence, named and pic splashed on the news. Former muay thai instructor who sexually assaulted woman gets jail and caning https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/courts-crime/former-muay-thai-instructor-who-sexually-assaulted-woman-gets-jail-and-cane In short, please consider seriously before doing something stupid to satisfy your lust. The shame and harsh sentence just ain't worth the effort. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Another guy Posted March 6, 2020 Report Share Posted March 6, 2020 24 minutes ago, Guest Guest said: Isnt Europeans very tolerant towards human rights and gays? They allow gays to be married, buy house etc so how can europeans hit a gay simply by looking? Please do not spread propaganda to make singapore look good. dun be stupid leh, it has nothing to do with europeans being tolerant towards human rights and gays. obviously you have not seen other parts of the world enough. Like it or not there are many homophobic guys around and some straight guys are just not comfortable with gay guys, no matter how liberal the world has become, even in ang moh countries. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fab Posted March 7, 2020 Report Share Posted March 7, 2020 5 hours ago, Guest News Reader said: The law here does not discriminate between gays and straights as one ignorant guest claimed. This straight guy suffered worse fate, heavier sentence, named and pic splashed on the news. Former muay thai instructor who sexually assaulted woman gets jail and caning https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/courts-crime/former-muay-thai-instructor-who-sexually-assaulted-woman-gets-jail-and-cane In short, please consider seriously before doing something stupid to satisfy your lust. The shame and harsh sentence just ain't worth the effort. Penetrated by finger or kkj? He may have been overconfident and assumed the lady can't resist his charm. Quote 鍾意就好，理佢男定女 never argue with the guests. let them bark all they want. 结缘不结怨 解怨不解缘 After I have said what I wanna say, I don't care what you say. 看穿不说穿 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Tyler nipples Posted March 7, 2020 Report Share Posted March 7, 2020 1 hour ago, fab said: Penetrated by finger or kkj? He may have been overconfident and assumed the lady can't resist his charm. 真的是TOM淹公lorrrr Hamsup. Finger penetrate la U tink penistration meh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted March 7, 2020 Report Share Posted March 7, 2020 10 hours ago, Guest Another guy said: dun be stupid leh, it has nothing to do with europeans being tolerant towards human rights and gays. obviously you have not seen other parts of the world enough. Like it or not there are many homophobic guys around and some straight guys are just not comfortable with gay guys, no matter how liberal the world has become, even in ang moh countries. You do not be stupid! People like Hui Hui and roy had opened our eyes to the europeans on how tolerant and open they are on human rights! These countries have laws that protect gays so I do not believe any straight will beat a gay just because a gay look at him! I never heard this happen in singapore so please how can it even happen in europe? You are implyinh singapore is safer for gays than europe! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted March 7, 2020 Report Share Posted March 7, 2020 10 hours ago, Guest News Reader said: The law here does not discriminate between gays and straights as one ignorant guest claimed. This straight guy suffered worse fate, heavier sentence, named and pic splashed on the news. Former muay thai instructor who sexually assaulted woman gets jail and caning https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/courts-crime/former-muay-thai-instructor-who-sexually-assaulted-woman-gets-jail-and-cane In short, please consider seriously before doing something stupid to satisfy your lust. The shame and harsh sentence just ain't worth the effort. Its so different!! Men touch woman breast get how long jail? https://stomp.straitstimes.com/singapore-seen/jail-fine-and-caning-for-man-who-touched-maids-breasts-while-family-was-away-on If man penetrate straight man with finger how long jail? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fab Posted March 7, 2020 Report Share Posted March 7, 2020 26 minutes ago, Guest Guest said: Its so different!! Men touch woman breast get how long jail? https://stomp.straitstimes.com/singapore-seen/jail-fine-and-caning-for-man-who-touched-maids-breasts-while-family-was-away-on If man penetrate straight man with finger how long jail? Depends on your leelation. Quote 鍾意就好，理佢男定女 never argue with the guests. let them bark all they want. 结缘不结怨 解怨不解缘 After I have said what I wanna say, I don't care what you say. 看穿不说穿 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest lao ter kee Posted March 7, 2020 Report Share Posted March 7, 2020 be careful hor don't anyhow poke here and there, end result kena piak piak piak. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest lao ter kee Posted March 7, 2020 Report Share Posted March 7, 2020 caning reality check, no joke one Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest straights hit Posted March 7, 2020 Report Share Posted March 7, 2020 18 hours ago, Guest Guest said: Isnt Europeans very tolerant towards human rights and gays? They allow gays to be married, buy house etc so how can europeans hit a gay simply by looking? Please do not spread propaganda to make singapore look good. You read about hate crimes and other crimes against gays in Europe and US. And read about gays being attacked because of staring at straights. Many very straight guys feel offended by a gay looking at him, often when with girlfriend around. They feel their masculinity is insulted and fear the girl might view them as "gay". This is not propaganda. https://m.dw.com/en/attacks-on-lgbt-people-increase-in-germany/a-50598761 https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/jun/14/homophobic-and-transphobic-hate-crimes-surge-in-england-and-wales https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/anti-gay-hate-rise-parts-europe-report-finds-n1130176 Articles from 2019 and current year. Do a better research please! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kimochi Posted March 9, 2020 Report Share Posted March 9, 2020 Likely one of our members... https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/nsf-photos-men-showering-ntu-performing-sex-acts-jurong-point-12518322?cid=fbcna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StockBottom Posted March 9, 2020 Report Share Posted March 9, 2020 Wah so much masturbation everywhere ... https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/nsf-photos-men-showering-ntu-performing-sex-acts-jurong-point-12518322 SINGAPORE: A full-time national serviceman trespassed into Nanyang Technological University (NTU) and took photos of men showering on campus. He also took photos and videos of other men performing sex acts in toilets at NTU and Jurong Point. Lau Jun Wei, 20, pleaded guilty on Monday (Mar 9) to two counts of criminal trespass and one count of using insulting behaviour with intent to cause alarm. An additional four charges of making an obscene film and criminal trespass will be taken into consideration for sentencing. The court heard that Lau was in NTU "hanging out with his friend" on Feb 24 last year when he needed to use the toilet. He headed to the toilet and as a dustbin was keeping the door ajar, did not have to use a key fob - an electronic device used by hall residents to enter secure places - to get in. When he was done, Lau heard the sound of running water and realised someone was showering in the last toilet cubicle, said Deputy Public Prosecutor Thiam Jia Min. He went to the cubicle, turned on his camera and placed his phone over the top of the door to film the naked man showering. "The accused then took two photographs and one video of the unknown man fully naked and showering, as he was curious as to how men looked like when they showered," said Ms Thiam. MADE OBSCENE VIDEOS AT JURONG POINT Other than the offences committed at NTU, Lau also went to nearby Jurong Point, where he took obscene videos. On Apr 3 last year, he took two videos of himself masturbating another man in a toilet at Jurong Point. A few weeks later on Apr 16, he returned to NTU and took photos and videos of a man masturbating inside a toilet cubicle. Days later, Lau went to a friend's dormitory room in NTU, where he stayed overnight. He went to use the toilet when he realised someone was showering in a cubicle. He went over and took two photos of the naked victim. This time, when Lau was leaving the toilet, he was confronted by one of the victim's friends, who had caught Lau holding his phone over the top of the cubicle door. The victim eventually called the police, feeling alarmed, distressed and traumatised by Lau's actions. Because of what happened, the victim eventually moved out of the hall. Lau's final offence took place on Jul 14 last year, when he filmed a man masturbating another man in a toilet at Jurong Point. The prosecution said it was not objecting to the calling of a probation suitability report, but reserves its position on sentencing until after the report is produced. She noted that Lau has expressed remorse. Lau's lawyer said his client had no previous criminal convictions, was young and has mental disorders. The judge called for a probation suitability report and adjourned sentencing to Apr 6. Source: CNA/ll(hs) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kimochi Posted March 9, 2020 Report Share Posted March 9, 2020 (edited) Wa I just sent ~ Edited March 9, 2020 by Kimochi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kimochi Posted March 9, 2020 Report Share Posted March 9, 2020 Trainee doctor caught filming guys urine at urinal ~ https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/former-trainee-doctor-videos-man-urinating-12518606 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest News reader Posted March 9, 2020 Report Share Posted March 9, 2020 Haa.. yet another news article to remind PLUs to think carefully of the consequences of the actions before doing something stupid !!! Think with your BRAIN and not with your dick ! While the sentences are not as heavy as the previous reported crime, it's not worthwhile to do jail time and be exposed to the shame just for few minutes or seconds of pleasure !!! Interestingly, one involved a policeman in his workplace!! Surely doesn't he know the maxim of DUN SHIT AT WHERE YOU EAT !! Piang !!! 🙄 Three men, including former doctor at SGH, plead guilty to filming men in toilets PUBLISHED 1 HOUR AGO FACEBOOKWHATSAPPTWITTER Shaffiq Alkhatib Court Correspondent SINGAPORE - Three men, including a former doctor at Singapore General Hospital, pleaded guilty on Monday (March 9) in separate cases to taking video clips of men in toilets. Jerry Christian Nagaputra, an Indonesian national and Singapore permanent resident, no longer works for MOH Holdings as of Oct 25 last year and his name was not on the list of registered healthcare professionals in Singapore on Monday. In another case, the offender is Seow Jia Chun, a full-time national serviceman (NSF) with the Singapore Police Force when he committed his offences. Court documents did not state if the corporal has since completed his national service. The third person who pleaded guilty is Lau Jun Wei, currently an NSF. It was not stated where he is serving. Nagaputra, 31, pleaded guilty to three charges under the Films Act after he recorded multiple videos of men using urinals in February last year. Twenty other similar charges will be taken into consideration during sentencing. Deputy Public Prosecutor Foo Shi Hao said that on Feb 9 last year, Nagaputra went to a men's toilet at Ngee Ann City shopping mall and filmed an unknown man who was then using a urinal. Two days later, he went to a men's toilet at Bugis Junction shopping centre and stood beside a 27-year-old man at a urinal. The court heard that Nagaputra had a mobile phone in his left hand with its camera facing the younger man's private parts. The man later confronted Nagaputra, who claimed that he only had photographs of food on the device. DPP Foo told District Judge May Mesenas: "However, while the accused was scrolling through his photographs, the complainant noticed an image of a urinal... and requested to check the phone himself. The accused complied." The complainant then found on the phone of the accused videos of men urinating, DPP Foo said. "The accused then tried to delete the films and flee the scene, but was stopped by the complainant and other passers-by," he added. The younger man then alerted the police. On Monday, defence lawyer Lee Teck Leng said that his client "resorted to filming men urinating as a dysfunctional method of coping with his adjustment disorder resulting from his multiple stressors". Judge Mesenas has called for a report to assess Nagaputra's suitability for a mandatory treatment order (MTO). Offenders given an MTO have to undergo treatment for their mental condition in lieu of jail time. Separately, Seow, 23, pleaded guilty to one count each of criminal trespass and harassment. The court heard that he was in a toilet at his workplace on Oct 29, 2018, when he heard somebody entering an adjacent cubicle. Details about his workplace cannot be revealed because of a gag order to protect his victim's identity. Seow then stood on a toilet bowl and used his mobile phone to record a video of his colleague. The 22-year-old man looked up and saw the device. The victim later confronted Seow before reporting matter to the latter's supervisor. In the third case, Lau, 20, pleaded guilty to a harassment charge and two counts of criminal trespass. Lau had targeted his victims at Nanyang Technological University (NTU), the court heard. He was not an NTU student, but had gone to the university on Feb 24 last year to hang out with a friend. He went to a toilet at around 5.20pm and heard the sound of somebody showering. Lau then placed his mobile phone at the top of a cubicle door to take two pictures and a video of a man who was in the nude at the time. Lau returned to the university on April 21 last year and committed a similar offence. The second victim's friend spotted him doing so and confronted him. The victim was also notified and he reported the incident to the police. Seow and Lau, both Singaporeans, were each offered bail of $5,000 on Monday. The district judges handling their respective cases also called for reports to assess if both are suitable for probation. All three men will be sentenced on April 6. For each charge under the Films Act, Nagaputra can be jailed for up to two years and fined up to $40,000. For each criminal trespass charge, offenders can be jailed for up to three months and fined up to $1,500. Those convicted of harassment can be jailed for up to six months and fined up to $5,000. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest disorder Posted March 10, 2020 Report Share Posted March 10, 2020 18 hours ago, Kimochi said: Trainee doctor caught filming guys urine at urinal ~ https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/former-trainee-doctor-videos-man-urinating-12518606 Quote: "He referred to psychiatric reports stating that his client suffered from adjustment disorder with depressed and anxious mood, which contributed to the offences. "He has voyeuristic behaviour and enjoyed watching men urinate," said the lawyer, quoting from the report. "He resorted to filming men urinating as a dysfunctional method of coping with his adjustment disorder resulting from his multiple stressors." I find this are cheap excuses. he is a voyeur and intends to collect videos from other men's penises to arouse himself re-watching them, probably jerking to it. It is well know in psychology , guys can release stress by simply jerking alone at a toilet. How do you release your stress by filming others? Isn't it the aim to get a glimpse on the penis and get aroused? Watch the film at home and getting aroused again. Sure, it could be for the accused being socially awkward or a separated loner and having difficulties in engaging into sex acts with men and the films were just a substitute. Sure, he could have been oppressed and due to parent's education, religious reasons living in denial of being gay. The mental disorder was probably more the obsession to film plenty of guys at urinals and not recognising the wrong in filming others without consent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kimochi Posted March 10, 2020 Report Share Posted March 10, 2020 16 minutes ago, Guest disorder said: Quote: "He referred to psychiatric reports stating that his client suffered from adjustment disorder with depressed and anxious mood, which contributed to the offences. "He has voyeuristic behaviour and enjoyed watching men urinate," said the lawyer, quoting from the report. "He resorted to filming men urinating as a dysfunctional method of coping with his adjustment disorder resulting from his multiple stressors." I find this are cheap excuses. he is a voyeur and intends to collect videos from other men's penises to arouse himself re-watching them, probably jerking to it. It is well know in psychology , guys can release stress by simply jerking alone at a toilet. How do you release your stress by filming others? Isn't it the aim to get a glimpse on the penis and get aroused? Watch the film at home and getting aroused again. Sure, it could be for the accused being socially awkward or a separated loner and having difficulties in engaging into sex acts with men and the films were just a substitute. Sure, he could have been oppressed and due to parent's education, religious reasons living in denial of being gay. The mental disorder was probably more the obsession to film plenty of guys at urinals and not recognising the wrong in filming others without consent. You can give all sorts of excuses to try to lighten your sentence ... But its an unorthodox way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 18, 2020 Report Share Posted March 18, 2020 On 3/17/2020 at 9:26 AM, Since u r here said: Not very wise Why not very wise? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fab Posted March 27, 2020 Report Share Posted March 27, 2020 The trial took 4 years? Wow. Quote 鍾意就好，理佢男定女 never argue with the guests. let them bark all they want. 结缘不结怨 解怨不解缘 After I have said what I wanna say, I don't care what you say. 看穿不说穿 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fab Posted March 29, 2020 Report Share Posted March 29, 2020 15 minutes ago, Since u r here said: it took very long to capture him and he was living in msia leh He was extradited to Singapore only in 2016. Quote 鍾意就好，理佢男定女 never argue with the guests. let them bark all they want. 结缘不结怨 解怨不解缘 After I have said what I wanna say, I don't care what you say. 看穿不说穿 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fab Posted March 29, 2020 Report Share Posted March 29, 2020 5 minutes ago, Since u r here said: need to gather more bkgrd when he was in Msia too For 4 years? Quote 鍾意就好，理佢男定女 never argue with the guests. let them bark all they want. 结缘不结怨 解怨不解缘 After I have said what I wanna say, I don't care what you say. 看穿不说穿 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StockBottom Posted March 30, 2020 Report Share Posted March 30, 2020 (edited) High Court judge dismisses all three challenges to Section 377A https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/377a-challenge-dismissed-high-court-judge-penal-code-12588738 SINGAPORE: Three men have failed in their challenges against Section 377A of the penal code, after a High Court judge dismissed their court actions against the law that criminalises sex between men on Monday (Mar 30). Justice See Kee Oon will release his full judgment grounds at a later date, lawyers told CNA outside the chambers shortly after the decision. According to Section 377A of the Penal Code, any man who commits any act of gross indecency with another man in public or in private can be jailed for up to two years. This extends to any man who abets such an act, procures or attempts to procure such an act. The verdict was delivered in chambers, four months after arguments were made by the lawyers for the three men: Disc jockey Johnson Ong Ming, retired general practitioner Roy Tan Seng Kee and Bryan Choong Chee Hoong, the former executive director of LGBT non-profit organisation Oogachaga. Mr Tan's lawyer, M Ravi, spoke to the media after the hearing, saying that he is working with a team to study the prospects of appeal. He said the decision was "astounding" and "utterly shocking" because "you still criminalise these people". Mr Ravi had argued on behalf of Mr Tan that the "absurd and arbitrary application" of the law is a violation of the Constitution as all gay and bisexual men are obligated to report their consensual private sexual acts to the police. This is "incongruous with the so-called non-proactive enforcement of Section 377A", said Mr Ravi, who also argued that this law infringes the right to equality, life, personal liberty and expression. Mr Choong's lawyers, led by Senior Counsel Harpreet Singh Nehal, had argued based on new historical material that was not available during a 2014 appeal. They pointed to recently declassified documents demonstrating that the introduction of Section 377A in 1938 was to criminalise "rampant male prostitution" when Singapore was under British colonial rule. Mr Ong's lawyers, helmed by Mr Eugene Thuraisingam, put forth expert scientific evidence on the nature of sexual orientation, arguing that homosexuals cannot wilfully change their orientation and that Section 377A is discriminatory and violates the Constitution. The Attorney-General's Chambers had maintained that Section 377A serves a "legitimate and reasonable" state interest, "regardless of whether and how it is enforced". They said the issue was "a deeply divisive socio-political" one that should instead be decided by Parliament, as the latter comprises democratically elected representatives accountable to Singaporeans. Source: CNA/ll(rw) Edited March 30, 2020 by StockBottom Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest disorder Posted April 2, 2020 Report Share Posted April 2, 2020 Look those people who write such stuff are probably gay haters and probably never came across any gay person! I don't approve what the culprit did. You just don't touch kids and leave them alone sexually. He did wrong and should be punished for his stupid foolish acts. The person writing the articles just needed to stress that gays are having a psychological disorder! This has been the case for plenty of years. It was always said, gays have a mental disorder. Before the government y decriminalised gay sex in Mainland China, gays were treated as psychic perverts. (It is not long ago). Just repeat it... And it supports what is out there in the straight forums: Gays are all pedophiles... The culprit was just the best example to remind on these stereotypes again. (Don't get it wrong, I don't have this opinion, just bringing it back to awareness on the common stereotypes against gays). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Loquacious Larry Laminator Posted April 2, 2020 Report Share Posted April 2, 2020 All gay adults need to stay away from any kind of sexual behavior around or towards children. End of story. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted May 1, 2020 Report Share Posted May 1, 2020 Teacher charged with performing sex act on 14-year-old student in toilet cubicle By LOUISA TANG Published27 APRIL, 2020 UPDATED 27 APRIL, 2020 SINGAPORE — A 38-year-old school teacher was charged in a district court on Friday (April 24) with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old boy last month. Court documents stated that the man allegedly performed a sex act on the boy in a men’s toilet cubicle meant for people with disabilities. This happened at the Junction 8 office tower in Bishan on March 2 at about 4pm. The Singaporean man cannot be named because of a court order to protect the boy’s identity, as he teaches at the school that the boy attends, District Judge Lorraine Ho said on Friday. A police prosecutor told the court that it is believed the man is “involved in several similar cases”, and that there was a risk of the alleged victim’s identity being disclosed if the man was named. On account of this, the school’s name cannot be revealed either. The type of school as well as its location were not disclosed. The nationality of the alleged victim was also not made known. The judge placed the accused man in remand and other investigations into his alleged conduct are being done. If convicted of sexual assault by penetration, he could be jailed up to 20 years, and fined or caned. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts