Jump to content
Male HQ

Post Your Random Thoughts

Atrapada

By Atrapada
in Members' Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 12.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

merlinkun
merlinkun

Okay.

merlinkun
merlinkun

Sauna.

Radioboi
Radioboi

Posted Images

Kage Newbie

Kage

Posted
Posted

True lah, I don't think most people can forgive someone who pushed them down a flight of stairs lor.

The most awkward start to a new r/s if D ever decides to date him. Imagine telling other people how they met, lulz. "Oh, he tried to break my neck and well, I guess we just hit it off after that."

That'd be awesome. I think they can make a good couple story, just imagine it screening on the movie screens. I think it'd blow the popularity charts off. Anyway, haha...aiyo eh, ma fan sio such things. I'd hideee, hide forevaaaaa!

You can complain that roses have thorns, or you can also rejoice that thorns have roses

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kunshinji Newbie

kunshinji

Posted
Posted

That'd be awesome. I think they can make a good couple story, just imagine it screening on the movie screens. I think it'd blow the popularity charts off. Anyway, haha...aiyo eh, ma fan sio such things. I'd hideee, hide forevaaaaa!

Aiyo.. I think kena pushed downstairs le, "D" won't want to meet him also liao...

- It's always darkest before the dawn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Blissfull Newbie

Blissfull

Posted
Posted

Oh, so you think you know me now, have you forgotten how, you would make me feel when you drag my spirits down but thank you for the pain, it made me raise my game and Im still rising i still rising, yeah

"Well, I didn't know it would come to this but that's what happens when you're on your own."

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kage Newbie

Kage

Posted
Posted

Friends with Benefits?

You scums are devoid of human morality. You scoundrels defile the word 'faith'.

I beg to defer. Everyone shares a different set of ethic. I don't see people who does it flames people who does not. What is ethical to you might not be ethical to someone else, so yeah, *shrugs*.

Faith comes in many forms, it's flexible, it's not just a dead thing. Well, I don't really support people who go for friends with benefits neither do I share any prejudice or discrimination against them. My question to you is, why are you feeling such strong emotions or hatred against them? The main reason why people get upset and angry is because they feel hurt, threatened or unsecured. Which category do you belong to? Search deep. ^^.

CLEMENTI WOODS PARK!! Wo lai leeeee!!!

You can complain that roses have thorns, or you can also rejoice that thorns have roses

Link to comment
Share on other sites
The.Intrv. Explorer

The.Intrv.

Posted
Posted (edited)

I beg to defer. Everyone shares a different set of ethic. I don't see people who does it flames people who does not. What is ethical to you might not be ethical to someone else, so yeah, *shrugs*.

Faith comes in many forms, it's flexible, it's not just a dead thing. Well, I don't really support people who go for friends with benefits neither do I share any prejudice or discrimination against them. My question to you is, why are you feeling such strong emotions or hatred against them? The main reason why people get upset and angry is because they feel hurt, threatened or unsecured. Which category do you belong to? Search deep. ^^.

CLEMENTI WOODS PARK!! Wo lai leeeee!!!

I'd love to seek your views on the various forms of faith and the flexibility in it. Faith however, in my, I repeat, in my perspective, makes no allowance for grey areas; it is the arrant devotion to someone. You can't say infidelity is a form of faith can you? Say, you picture a relationship and both parties possess these friends with benefits. Tell me why and tell me what for do people like these get into a pseudo-relationship, and tell me how this is condonable.

You have pointed how everyone shares different sets of ethics in society. Adultery, murder, rape, arson -- These acts are committed based on one's set of ethics as well. Do we not discriminate, and do we not harbor a tinge of prejudice against these people but condone and overlook them?

Edited by The.Intrv.

For these flaws I lament.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
iamziz Grand Master

iamziz

Posted
Posted

Last few hours in London and so many men so little time

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

善待对人。麻烦用英文来表达信息。不是每个人都会看的懂中文 。| “People need to learn the art of making an argument. Often there is no

right or wrong. It's just your opinion vs someone else's opinion. How you deliver that opinion could make the difference between opening a mind,

changing an opinion or shutting the door. Sometimes folk just don't know when they've "argued" enough. Learn when to shut up."

― J'son M. Lee 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
EasleyLim Newbie

EasleyLim

Posted
Posted

I'd love to seek your views on the various forms of faith and the flexibility in it. Faith however, in my, I repeat, in my perspective, makes no allowance for grey areas; it is the arrant devotion to someone. You can't say infidelity is a form of faith can you? Say, you picture a relationship and both parties possess these friends with benefits. Tell me why and tell me what for do people like these get into a pseudo-relationship, and tell me how this is condonable.

You have pointed how everyone shares different sets of ethics in society. Adultery, murder, rape, arson -- These acts are committed based on one's set of ethics as well. Do we not discriminate, and do we not harbor a tinge of prejudice against these people but condone and overlook them?

Waaaaait, are we talking about religious faith or 'I HAVE FAITH IN YOUR DECISION' kind of faith?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kage Newbie

Kage

Posted
Posted

I'd love to seek your views on the various forms of faith and the flexibility in it. Faith however, in my, I repeat, in my perspective, makes no allowance for grey areas; it is the arrant devotion to someone. You can't say infidelity is a form of faith can you? Say, you picture a relationship and both parties possess these friends with benefits. Tell me why and tell me what for do people like these get into a pseudo-relationship, and tell me how this is condonable.

You have pointed how everyone shares different sets of ethics in society. Adultery, murder, rape, arson -- These acts are committed based on one's set of ethics as well. Do we not discriminate, and do we not harbor a tinge of prejudice against these people but condone and overlook them?

I'd like to get the situation right first. In my opinion, if both parties that were in a relationship considers it an open relationship, I don't see why it should be condemned by others. Unless you're naming a situation where both parties decide that its a red light for an open relationship and then one party goes out and do things behind the back of the other, then it has my disapproval.

It's like an ethical dilemma. Some people believe that retributive justice should be used against people whereas the other group believes that reformative justice should be in place. Theoretically speaking, both ideologies are perfect, but it always goes by the views of the majorities. Which brings back to your question on adultery, murder, arson,. rape etc etc. If the world we lived in from the very beginning has all these crimes as a must do thing before you come into age, would it still be 'illegal' and would it still be a place where they harbor prejudices and discrimination against people who acted out accordingly?

That's just from another perspective. But yeah, what I'm trying to say is that I strongly believe that there is no rights and wrongs in the society. The black and white has always been painted by the majorities and committing such activities does not mean that they are wrong. It simply means that people the majority thinks it is.

Okay, back to my views on faith. See it from another direction, if its a mutual consent between two people for an open relationship, I can't see why it should be judged. Both parties have fun outside etc etc but it's only a form of physical satisfaction for them. Their emotional needs and faith still remains with the other party. It's not justifiable to judge and say that just because they are in an open relationship, they are being 'unfaithful'.

Anyhow, I'm not trying to convince you to think otherwise, but it's just another perspective that others see from. I have no qualms against people who practice open rs or a three way rs. To me as long as it is mutual, I think it's fine. *Shrugs*, I believe you have your own set of ethics but please don't force them upon someone else.

Like what they have being saying

"Religion is like a penis. It's fine to have one and it's fine to be proud of it, but please don't whip it out in public and start waving it around... and PLEASE don't try to shove it down my child's throat.

Sincerely, tired of hearing your religious guff "

Likewise I think it applies for this case. One man's meat is another's poison.

You can complain that roses have thorns, or you can also rejoice that thorns have roses

Link to comment
Share on other sites
The.Intrv. Explorer

The.Intrv.

Posted
Posted (edited)

I'd like to get the situation right first. In my opinion, if both parties that were in a relationship considers it an open relationship, I don't see why it should be condemned by others. Unless you're naming a situation where both parties decide that its a red light for an open relationship and then one party goes out and do things behind the back of the other, then it has my disapproval.

It's like an ethical dilemma. Some people believe that retributive justice should be used against people whereas the other group believes that reformative justice should be in place. Theoretically speaking, both ideologies are perfect, but it always goes by the views of the majorities. Which brings back to your question on adultery, murder, arson,. rape etc etc. If the world we lived in from the very beginning has all these crimes as a must do thing before you come into age, would it still be 'illegal' and would it still be a place where they harbor prejudices and discrimination against people who acted out accordingly?

That's just from another perspective. But yeah, what I'm trying to say is that I strongly believe that there is no rights and wrongs in the society. The black and white has always been painted by the majorities and committing such activities does not mean that they are wrong. It simply means that people the majority thinks it is.

Okay, back to my views on faith. See it from another direction, if its a mutual consent between two people for an open relationship, I can't see why it should be judged. Both parties have fun outside etc etc but it's only a form of physical satisfaction for them. Their emotional needs and faith still remains with the other party. It's not justifiable to judge and say that just because they are in an open relationship, they are being 'unfaithful'.

Anyhow, I'm not trying to convince you to think otherwise, but it's just another perspective that others see from. I have no qualms against people who practice open rs or a three way rs. To me as long as it is mutual, I think it's fine. *Shrugs*, I believe you have your own set of ethics but please don't force them upon someone else.

Like what they have being saying

"Religion is like a penis. It's fine to have one and it's fine to be proud of it, but please don't whip it out in public and start waving it around... and PLEASE don't try to shove it down my child's throat.

Sincerely, tired of hearing your religious guff "

Likewise I think it applies for this case. One man's meat is another's poison.

First off, I am an atheist and therefore my faith has got no God(s) in it. You could do away with that humorous religious wang quote. It is the faith between two persons in love that I am referring to.

  • Faith(noun), "Loyalty to a person or thing; allegiance".

Secondly, I have never once attempted to force my personal values & ethics down anybody's throat; it was of criticism towards such people whom I was referring to on my initial post and all of those words used had extended neither the intention nor compulsion of any individuals here to agree with my viewpoints. I surmise that this thread is titlted 'Post Your Random Thoughts' and not 'Coerce Your Ideologies Into Random People', no? *Cringes*

I believe you have misinterpreted my context of a relationship. This relationship I am depicting is a sacroscant bond between two individuals who shares similar affections for each other and are therefore paired together in what you would call a relationship. The faith that I had cited is the loyalty between these two individuals. It is to be upheld resolutely and to never be wavered by any circumstance; it transcends the desideratum of physical pleasures.

While one may possess the emotional needs and 'faith' towards his other half, even after thrusting his shaft into another's ass or having his ass thrusted by another's shaft, emotions of betrayal and infidelity still are present during that whole 'temporal physical pleasure derivation' process. This is fine of course, if both parties in that particular relationship are in a consensus for condoning such behavior. This is however not admissible that does not happen to be the case.

Thirdly, I am not implying that my ethics are of utter soundness. Therefore, I do not preach them to other people but express them openly instead. I ask not for others to agree with my viewpoint, but for the sheer animadversion towards the breach of faith.

Edited by The.Intrv.

For these flaws I lament.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kage Newbie

Kage

Posted
Posted

First off, I am an atheist and therefore my faith has got no God(s) in it. You could do away with that humorous religious wang quote. It is the faith between two persons in love that I am referring to.

  • Faith(noun), "Loyalty to a person or thing; allegiance".

Secondly, I have never once attempted to force my personal values & ethics down anybody's throat; it was of criticism towards such people whom I was referring to on my initial post and all of those words used had extended neither the intention nor compulsion of any individuals here to agree with my viewpoints. I surmise that this thread is titlted 'Post Your Random Thoughts' and not 'Coerce Your Ideologies Into Random People', no? *Cringes*

I believe you have misinterpreted my context of a relationship. This relationship I am depicting is a sacroscant bond between two individuals who shares similar affections for each other and are therefore paired together in what you would call a relationship. The faith that I had cited is the loyalty between these two individuals. It is to be upheld resolutely and to never be wavered by any circumstance; it transcends the desideratum of physical pleasures.

While one may possess the emotional needs and 'faith' towards his other half, even after thrusting his shaft into another's ass or having his ass thrusted by another's shaft, emotions of betrayal and infidelity still are present during that whole 'temporal physical pleasure derivation' process. This is fine of course, if both parties in that particular relationship are in a consensus for condoning such behavior. This is however not admissible that does not happen to be the case.

Thirdly, I am not implying that my ethics are of utter soundness. Therefore, I do not preach them to other people but express them openly instead. I ask not for others to agree with my viewpoint, but for the sheer animadversion towards the breach of faith.

Erm, I think you're missing the point of what I quoted. What I was trying to get at is that people share different perspectives and that what you think does not necessarily covers what others think.

*shrugs*, well you didn't specify your 'context' of the relationship, so I believe you were taking your aim on the general term of a relationship and with that was my take on it, no? o o.

Mmm...I think I a bit blur too HAHA, was having a major kick ass migraine @@, anyway maybe I misinterpreted what you were trying to say. From what you said back there, I thought you were trying to be persuasive o_o;. Eh don't need be so sarcastic can, I'm only sharing what I think nia @@;

Count down to project end date!!! Chiong ahhhh!!

You can complain that roses have thorns, or you can also rejoice that thorns have roses

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...