Guest Posted September 28, 2016 Report Share Posted September 28, 2016 Anyone who has a small framed body like skeletal structure is kinda small compared to others (AKA height and width of body)? And have you guys managed to get big and buff despite your small frame? I have a small frame, my friends tell me that I'm very small, but I am quite muscular compared to them. Please advice Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Glyph Posted September 28, 2016 Report Share Posted September 28, 2016 Er.. 168/61 isn't small. Your friends are probably referring to your height. And sorry for bursting your bubble butt but the chances of growing a few centimeters more after puberty is as good as none. You can keep bulking horizontally, though I wouldn't recommend it... not at that height at least. <<< wants to bulk too. Help pls. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 28, 2016 Report Share Posted September 28, 2016 4 hours ago, Glyph said: Er.. 168/61 isn't small. Your friends are probably referring to your height. And sorry for bursting your bubble butt but the chances of growing a few centimeters more after puberty is as good as none. You can keep bulking horizontally, though I wouldn't recommend it... not at that height at least. <<< wants to bulk too. Help pls. I'm kinda bulking a little tho, I wanna increase my width more cause I'm kinda more lean and toned but I want some size. Not overly big tho Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gympump Posted September 29, 2016 Report Share Posted September 29, 2016 Yes you can. (not height though). Tough for a start but it is definitely possible. AlifBttm 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xydboy Posted September 29, 2016 Report Share Posted September 29, 2016 23 hours ago, Samsam said: Anyone who has a small framed body like skeletal structure is kinda small compared to others (AKA height and width of body)? And have you guys managed to get big and buff despite your small frame? I have a small frame, my friends tell me that I'm very small, but I am quite muscular compared to them. Please advice 168cm and 61kg, yes still possible. Some "famous" but unscientifically proven method is to measure the height-100, that would be the "ideal" built that you can achieve, supposedly genetically. So based on that, you still have lots of room to grow. Do eat more and workout more. Quote Follow me at http://instagram.com/ytraymond =) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
traverserxxx Posted September 29, 2016 Report Share Posted September 29, 2016 43 minutes ago, xydboy said: 168cm and 61kg, yes still possible. Some "famous" but unscientifically proven method is to measure the height-100, that would be the "ideal" built that you can achieve, supposedly genetically. So based on that, you still have lots of room to grow. Do eat more and workout more. height-100 means the weight? Eg 168cm - 100 so that "ideal" would be 68kg? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted September 29, 2016 Report Share Posted September 29, 2016 But don't be obsessed. There's this guy at my gym who's got a great body. For some reason, he also feels the need to be very 拽. I'm wondering if that's a reaction to being 5'3". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 29, 2016 Report Share Posted September 29, 2016 8 hours ago, xydboy said: 168cm and 61kg, yes still possible. Some "famous" but unscientifically proven method is to measure the height-100, that would be the "ideal" built that you can achieve, supposedly genetically. So based on that, you still have lots of room to grow. Do eat more and workout more. Oh I've read about this before I'm currently 64kg so 4 more to go Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xydboy Posted September 30, 2016 Report Share Posted September 30, 2016 On 9/29/2016 at 11:36 PM, traverserxxx said: height-100 means the weight? Eg 168cm - 100 so that "ideal" would be 68kg? Yeap that is it. Its not scientifically sound cause evidently it has not been proven to be robust. But this has served its function as a rule of thumb of many bodybuilders or any form of physique athletes. Quote Follow me at http://instagram.com/ytraymond =) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heliumduck Posted October 1, 2016 Report Share Posted October 1, 2016 8 hours ago, xydboy said: Yeap that is it. Its not scientifically sound cause evidently it has not been proven to be robust. But this has served its function as a rule of thumb of many bodybuilders or any form of physique athletes. can you advice how to be overweight ? i would like to be 75kg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xydboy Posted October 1, 2016 Report Share Posted October 1, 2016 11 hours ago, heliumduck said: can you advice how to be overweight ? i would like to be 75kg Increase caloric intake. Not able to gain weight, just eat some more and work out more. No rocket science, just pure hard work. Quote Follow me at http://instagram.com/ytraymond =) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mastiff Posted October 31, 2016 Report Share Posted October 31, 2016 Many professional body builders aren't tall at all! In my experience, it's actually more difficult to really develop fuller looking muscles on longer limbs. I feel that shorter guys who really work out tend to show more impressive results quicker. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heliumduck Posted November 1, 2016 Report Share Posted November 1, 2016 post a pic of your ideal small frame but big guy plenty of range to choose from on IG so we know what your destination is, but the progress is the same la EAT sayfirst 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest blog Posted November 11, 2016 Report Share Posted November 11, 2016 168/61 isn't small. Nor big. When I started out, I was 168/170, 55kg. Not impressive in terms of weight. I then embarked on a speed course in weight gain through lifting weights. And gained 10kg! in a couple of months. It required dedication, plenty of sleep, supplements to aid recovery, and a mind that is free of worries. I achieved it at a time when I was 55!! and out of work and so could afford the time. Once you achieved what you think is your optimum weight, you have to continue 'maintenance' or upkeep. Otherwise, like in my case, start to lose weight slowly but not to the extent of what I started out as... underweight. Finally, eating without doing workout will not work if your metabolism is high. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heliumduck Posted November 11, 2016 Report Share Posted November 11, 2016 9 minutes ago, Guest blog said: 168/61 isn't small. Nor big. When I started out, I was 168/170, 55kg. Not impressive in terms of weight. I then embarked on a speed course in weight gain through lifting weights. And gained 10kg! in a couple of months. It required dedication, plenty of sleep, supplements to aid recovery, and a mind that is free of worries. I achieved it at a time when I was 55!! and out of work and so could afford the time. Once you achieved what you think is your optimum weight, you have to continue 'maintenance' or upkeep. Otherwise, like in my case, start to lose weight slowly but not to the extent of what I started out as... underweight. Finally, eating without doing workout will not work if your metabolism is high. eat M O R E lor, boh pian Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts